From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15936C49EA6 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87A161C32 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229952AbhFZQvP (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:51:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35200 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229916AbhFZQvP (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:51:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53A8C061574 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id j4so22146584lfc.8 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:48:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NLmft7BFDAw89nJTJt+TFhz0eJX3OVF/x/Zcwe4/S24=; b=cDWHscMkkZhgrksxgNX7kF5+px69aJ0K4fxxC5YJjxRONbFTVPZljkRniPlkmR5LeQ tD+jPpf2UyDIFs8BY+xOr29ly8oJ5rQZJGe0ZVDa5iW36VKoshjH4c699CQGw4lQKTZK qRC5IPMXgPNsW6Dt0ncTigehXGY3RlDEzmV2E7oHauNIklDK7/TEjrr3ilmdszaIJ7aA ncofH08taGaaOCaeYL871Ad303KVUxUEz+PlkpSpSwjLQ/LrjoMuYF7T6tbovTipTSzn K+mGuYaJzq8ZDkBDgxdiusD6+sA9IiEkhFfsLjvlX4SF4uTRmE3AiWjDLnKWfTZ/Hiyh bUpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NLmft7BFDAw89nJTJt+TFhz0eJX3OVF/x/Zcwe4/S24=; b=tP9l+ee2zYmYvhgbdAxWu+AQBGM2yU1fK7FkiAOlbFYi2IrcvhmFriaPnGlzckuOF2 kS9L50rI27fEaHYC7LkZ+IPIDyiOLanlgYwziGqu8fNkcAG7l0mqa8E/GKxSKYO2Yh9+ ff5p8VhV9lEV6jtMXPoe8jEF9XjB6OGm3RKeUB4TOoGXvCPTC8y0cg2Lt09FipbR4k5T vmqMzonNIkuJK7f1WxbDkWzV/9UxJk7Z+h27DLPIpWqjEJPwg/pbkkhp/wHH43UrdWLS 43y24QJk4xsLuuvVdGfG21IzhHFX3N0OzOwp33zDkanImfN44F/6nG/y0pUWjXe+lsxQ 2g9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530d+tZWP0Bg3q57IKzYYFDPjeKXhQrcb4570wbkVutnkMQ1LMG6 m8fXJJeXEF8m/RWSKhx8wIN9BbHKmM32ozqz1cEdSN8q/h4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUdQLQOfTPk5FAPKMoDsQztklnlX3KZCNRAOLYy+xCPQTfn9vDK0O1q52Bt20P9Hungy79R2WhD9q3WEIkn98= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4d8f:: with SMTP id g15mr12204567lfe.133.1624726129635; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:48:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Steve French Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:48:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Signing negotiate context To: samba-technical , CIFS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org I tried an experiment to Samba 4.13.3 and also to Azure sending the new signing negotiate context during negprot. Azure ignored it as expected, but Samba server rejected it with "STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER" (it wasn't obvious at first glance what was invalid about it but perhaps Samba wants different rounding than Azure). Has anyone tested the signing negotiate context (e.g. newer Windows) to Samba server? -- Thanks, Steve