Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs/smb2transport.c: Make some functions static

[Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>]

Yes - notify init should be static - but not SMB2_notify

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:48 AM zhengbin (A) <zhengbin13@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/9/23 14:33, Steve French wrote:
> > The code to call SMB2_change_notify (from an ioctl) should make it in
> > pretty soon (let's hope we can finish testing it this  week).   The
> > fix to inotify to allow inotify to call into a network file system
> > will be helpful in the long run, but in the short term at least a GUI
> > should be able to call into a cifs.ko specific ioctl soon for it.
> Thus SMB2_notify_init should be static? I send a patch later?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM zhengbin (A) <zhengbin13@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2019/9/23 13:07, Steve French wrote:
> >>> Thanks - merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next
> >>>
> >>> Aurélien -
> >>> FYI - it makes minor update to code you changed to remove the warning.
> >> We have a similar warning in fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
> >>
> >> fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c:3184:1: warning: symbol 'SMB2_notify_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c:3213:1: warning: symbol 'SMB2_change_notify' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >>
> >>
> >> while these two functions are introduced by commit af8d46ab49b8
> >>
> >> ("smb3: add missing worker function for SMB3 change notify"). SMB2_notify_init is called by SMB2_change_notify
> >>
> >> No one calls  SMB2_change_notify? Or we will call SMB2_change_notify in the future?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 2:13 PM zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>>> Fix sparse warnings:
> >>>>
> >>>> fs/cifs/smb2transport.c:52:1: warning: symbol 'smb3_crypto_shash_allocate' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >>>> fs/cifs/smb2transport.c:101:4: warning: symbol 'smb2_find_chan_signkey' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >>>> fs/cifs/smb2transport.c:121:17: warning: symbol 'smb2_find_global_smb_ses' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >>>>
> >>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  fs/cifs/smb2transport.c | 7 ++++---
> >>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c b/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c
> >>>> index 12988df..7cc8641 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c
> >>>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ smb2_crypto_shash_allocate(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> >>>>                                &server->secmech.sdeschmacsha256);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>>> -int
> >>>> +static int
> >>>>  smb3_crypto_shash_allocate(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>         struct cifs_secmech *p = &server->secmech;
> >>>> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ smb311_crypto_shash_allocate(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> >>>>         return rc;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>>> -u8 *smb2_find_chan_signkey(struct cifs_ses *ses, struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> >>>> +static u8 *
> >>>> +smb2_find_chan_signkey(struct cifs_ses *ses, struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>         int i;
> >>>>         struct cifs_chan *chan;
> >>>> @@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ u8 *smb2_find_chan_signkey(struct cifs_ses *ses, struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> >>>>         return NULL;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>>> -struct cifs_ses *
> >>>> +static struct cifs_ses *
> >>>>  smb2_find_global_smb_ses(__u64 ses_id)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>         struct TCP_Server_Info *server;
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.7.4
> >>>>
> >
>


-- 
Thanks,

Steve