From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399C2C2D0DB for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088BB20702 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hGanAmQa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727544AbgA3Szb (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:55:31 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f172.google.com ([209.85.166.172]:37657 "EHLO mail-il1-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727529AbgA3Szb (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:55:31 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f172.google.com with SMTP id v13so3990134iln.4 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:55:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CZeEb8FjE4DHJGjCeMVoihLV/ZKhpSh79haiybxPqxc=; b=hGanAmQaf1UvSvK/UmSFWeCfnDsaME3CyOCdRXwRurVF9JhdhZo/YFsrfND/lrkiN1 +ZpkFVfFsOYotm8HU/egDxnkGkjXVnTHm0IeBZaGlcAjM+9Eb+YoK5Am8Eaf+BJ3RNnj /XMYI35PTMNiDOCPedebN5DaaVqk6tG9TcyFnKB9G/7QSDxcLV/fxmdsU2Ee2yQjdEGw XeOveJduf0QS/svaI/Ckd6KaMM4aoOjKW9zpZC12hqbMe4/rU5G7pKZa3aTkEWcf/8X9 0V+7mmXmM92D0uyLL/CFebRYcCTR3osRzelTrbyiA+eQJAo7q416QR78nRLoekmtKzRc IUGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CZeEb8FjE4DHJGjCeMVoihLV/ZKhpSh79haiybxPqxc=; b=eecHvW58T9a95FyY1qIEx53l4dSjQLYCJqQDR+1lt10UEOLml5lyc//5rAnmMPN65L dJV4Zr3+wth8zAZuVVvP6rMl7iJnV4hYkaw7OGaoY1eTJZwUEOC8w4BBTmv09hh0NEXy kInQST6xJk6B0jHpG7SW0hxoUqi+qAkYktSet3AXZiEpE8Tpy30TFoX5dd8HkQ3x0xc2 zrShcBte1GhpSOLp5HWcspfcnAsYe8O3aipZbR8fdz8n19FWTwr3okW7gU4ilLKJv+2F v0FQ0lKZMBviuPIFptHRMWuUu31UWxBOzDs99KGrBaT7TquEGrWMekWbXK+Qm5IAc+yV E+3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUknkE8LPUCG9JPHq94ppMOVvH2Sl3jF9Ve6ZRoNE8ktm9sPwAd yrGqd9SLT6iKWL+I+UKGk66v2IN0sJjn6rrdZ47JGEHegGU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxcjxi5Ug64bB+V+4C0ZtozDYlYx1bsjSyTyjO67e9yU8EbD9HOnRuaLakMkGa7uut5x67iZ567PdOoYQvx1Hw= X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb8c:: with SMTP id z12mr5537168ilo.5.1580410530041; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:55:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <39643d7d-2abb-14d3-ced6-c394fab9a777@prodrive-technologies.com> <87png0boej.fsf@cjr.nz> <5260c45c-0a31-168d-f9db-83bb6bd4a2cf@prodrive-technologies.com> <878smoqouf.fsf@cjr.nz> <87k16417ud.fsf@cjr.nz> <87y2uh264k.fsf@cjr.nz> <3ddf0683-0213-1c43-bcc7-cfc3cb8bc28b@prodrive-technologies.com> <871rs8eq3j.fsf@cjr.nz> In-Reply-To: From: Steve French Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:55:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cifs.upcall requests ticket for wrong host when using dfs To: Jacob Shivers Cc: Paulo Alcantara , Martijn de Gouw , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Fix is already upstream, merged into mainline Linux (commit 5739375ee4230980166807d347cc21c305532bbc) On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacob Shivers wrote: > > Hello Paulo, > > I ran into this issue and noted that I can reproduce this 100% of the > time with a Samba SMB target. I tried with Windows SMB targets, even > when they are not part of the direct DFS namespace, but I have so far > been unable to reproduce that way. > > Hello Martijn, > Would you mind stating who the provider is for the impacted SMB target > in your environment? > > Thanks, > Jacob > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:06 AM Paulo Alcantara wrote: > > > > Hi Martijn, > > > > Martijn de Gouw writes: > > > > > Yes, so far so good. Thanks a lot for the quick response! Not a trivial > > > patch as far I as i can judge. > > > > Cool! Thanks for the confirmation. Just sent a patch with this fix, BTW. > > > > > Also the machine we have running with your other DFS patches is running > > > for 8 weeks now and survived several relocations of our dfs shares and > > > adding/removal of DCs! > > > > > > Is there any news on the acceptance of your [PATCH v4 0/6] DFS fixes? > > > > I don't have any news, but I'll talk to Steve and Aurelien about them. > > > > Thanks, > > Paulo > > > -- Thanks, Steve