From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F41DECAAD8 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232285AbiIVTH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:07:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49638 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232269AbiIVTH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:07:58 -0400 Received: from mail-oa1-x2e.google.com (mail-oa1-x2e.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52012FB333 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x2e.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-11eab59db71so15218522fac.11 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:07:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2E/C7DbYFbgaIr08r5WQJJ8lH65h8Rlpzk3fsg7D9e8=; b=Sc2t84MYNifRdpTZz6LHCdTHbGpHtePPoew2qsdF9HHe8gStsU2qKwHjLQmE1+oPPg I1EurkRBUsiV216mZSYCjX649kwgi5p9dGPj50oSNxaH8t9N5Lyt/GsKj+zklmLR6qEr 6R4aHXhiCm/iktm0j/EoGmNd0poPj6lF+d3aisz2dZom3AWJS8ZfcYs8qIfw2l7FOMBe HWJ3KinBwLAunUH38CmELQ+uYEnv7YZf9KTUM3+NhHM3aV3rTSVddlmYen3IgFOvDILn 1pehVy8LfZjvBTsHHkBR3BUiOkMUko7Ppki5o5o9Li47YyyXPlz3/ARUMXM7puPuP26M yXxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2E/C7DbYFbgaIr08r5WQJJ8lH65h8Rlpzk3fsg7D9e8=; b=zJOqmMtu4fa6QRilRUHZ6rgfUdmwJBzZhURaEb3zkP6yFafU3hZ8tVd/UR8/ihPrzD gfjAuCKGdFmBFr+q9J0QGMK5ZEK0gxf1bGfH3XE0yLFR3eDB3pmHNHm3b/bokbbXOwN8 IsMAtODBb63Ul/DWctzZx8tX9A30SHbmIXv9PLOzmGhE2/uebS0tC0UF4Jv0y13PIR2C EIa24a6te21TZ+qLVKiTtaxhbhssK22DlDc8Oyr+4umXTSTAI90xq/TLAxtaKwCNcD/x V550K/nfLeT19UseEXhZy9DstWfuSMqOFax2NNQaM2wtPHhjug6895lGYJ4VJslgzbCI U54g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2fJXWCiLUTHAh/Zsd9fvo4GwfisB7BBaQ8Q/QrwykF1hwpjXEM 9iKn0Oo1n6AOJ79cHz83IYsQ07p/Jnocp6O6i9x7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6d9RAgQ5lrUQAwZbu3DJT1/UNg9egieC9LHbxthXW7OebfrM1G5JLCjS1iPUbSyY1utPnUyQOKNNFWojmurr0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:600c:b0:12d:9e19:9860 with SMTP id t12-20020a056870600c00b0012d9e199860mr2966449oaa.172.1663873675323; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:07:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220922151728.1557914-1-brauner@kernel.org> <16ca7e4c-01df-3585-4334-6be533193ba6@schaufler-ca.com> In-Reply-To: <16ca7e4c-01df-3585-4334-6be533193ba6@schaufler-ca.com> From: Paul Moore Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:07:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/29] acl: add vfs posix acl api To: Casey Schaufler Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christian Brauner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Seth Forshee , Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:54 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 9/22/2022 10:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:27 AM Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> Could we please see the entire patch set on the LSM list? > > While I don't think that's necessarily wrong, I would like to point > > out that the gitweb interface actually does make it fairly easy to > > just see the whole patch-set. > > > > IOW, that > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/idmapping.git/log/?h=fs.acl.rework > > > > that Christian pointed to is not a horrible way to see it all. Go to > > the top-most commit, and it's easy to follow the parent links. > > I understand that the web interface is fine for browsing the changes. > It isn't helpful for making comments on the changes. The discussion > on specific patches (e.g. selinux) may have impact on other parts of > the system (e.g. integrity) or be relevant elsewhere (e.g. smack). It > can be a real problem if the higher level mailing list (the LSM list > in this case) isn't included. This is probably one of those few cases where Casey and I are in perfect agreement. I'd much rather see the patches hit my inbox than have to go hunting for them and then awkwardly replying to them (and yes, I know there are ways to do that, I just personally find it annoying). I figure we are all deluged with email on a daily basis and have developed mechanisms to deal with that in a sane way, what is 29 more patches on the pile? -- paul-moore.com