From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7A0C433EF for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DE560F25 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229689AbhINQXh (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:23:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36964 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229584AbhINQXg (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:23:36 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E03C061762 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id x27so30041354lfu.5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:22:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3dYD2uKNORcxZ6YMCdwcOxjjHXEclNcfa/CTjAP47gc=; b=aWJRDZPRQV27jEUKoc4qE6zGbRoWbKwm9kcYSPpoNuqjBLGs9WKOvCqbYQZ04P3jy1 4wsAum1KxojNT2yyO1DmteAlpzy+vIjQ6bjIvwLNB76bbbmj19VrvzgTZnYd6uwWG6vX yWKNOrbr5bi7cuk7kXat3qOTmWTGGPHSlwsBA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3dYD2uKNORcxZ6YMCdwcOxjjHXEclNcfa/CTjAP47gc=; b=zDcr7O5MAwoIV9QV3iblHUv2sX2WYfYqD0cqUW6lcytqREvj0pHfDAOEBD7FRkN3q8 RKNDtlC0JjTaLGQj02iuxZSESC+3DVC2rDjMKPtdBUjAEPxOTXU4aPhoON7tO1cpQVe0 KPOpY/5wKiyL5el/JRfONEyrzHb0OiqOqfD4zu1yXsUZHec4YK5V+g5KJ+4THMEQWIyA K30mfB7tQRP+tslMHCzt5Jxvwt3lncLsoO3ZO1rG0lSrP/I7bpJ/XPzPJ/M4yAHHu6W4 PljgriASH9TW8NydETGVlVK2IGcXKWpYUoEmVsxLfgKnPWlE4LCU7xRBMwXq4pZctcT4 wdLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gtgeaFJGiwAICllZCeFAlLTiBgo20YB+5VdzJ0pn5+b4fGtYd 8OLvlIkVY/WAqEvndAfNhIzDWJPTMcZSFoJEeIE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyLLsyDbtS3rrjynTkbnxdRc9WakHDM5E3QgU3vSJDXq+3rGwzmcnHSebXb6YbjNYPazz6IQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2253:: with SMTP id i19mr14081332lfu.281.1631636535380; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com (mail-lf1-f53.google.com. [209.85.167.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d15sm1250058lfn.220.2021.09.14.09.22.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id i25so26066030lfg.6 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3da5:: with SMTP id k37mr14013881lfv.655.1631636533920; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:22:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <163162767601.438332.9017034724960075707.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <163162767601.438332.9017034724960075707.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:21:58 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] fscache: Replace and remove old I/O API To: David Howells Cc: Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Steve French , Dominique Martinet , "open list:NFS, SUNRPC, AND..." , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Trond Myklebust , linux-cachefs@redhat.com, CIFS , Shyam Prasad N , Jeff Layton , Matthew Wilcox , Alexander Viro , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 6:54 AM David Howells wrote: > > (1) A simple fallback API is added that can read or write a single page > synchronously. The functions for this have "deprecated" in their names > as they have to be removed at some point. I'm looking at those patches, and there's no way I'll apply anything that starts out with moving to a "deprecated" interface. Call it "fallback" or "simple" or something that shows the intent, but no, I'm not taking patches that introduce a _new_ interface and call it "deprecated". Linus