From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495B9C4743F for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B616128E for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234072AbhFHVI3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:08:29 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:48599 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229526AbhFHVI3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:08:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623186395; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7qikh23JQj0rOROM36I+xJmZ0dRjFa9wyjTVsnQCQJc=; b=Z6Q+clfw7smvInX7AwswK2iYmbvesS0Oxdx8bAMxghV5kYssW2rzTXPYaEaSuLUuH/RW2u VOQTcBeaqO1xHYbd3ClxjjtQaRO5U3FHSvKyoO2A3CWREEoMbTAlEGPucWu8GqNxiZZIYy inzYzhVjthd+PQPsrPLoSktLsOiCHLQ= Received: from mail-il1-f197.google.com (mail-il1-f197.google.com [209.85.166.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-450-y6ELecgBMayC74OjwvdGew-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 17:06:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: y6ELecgBMayC74OjwvdGew-1 Received: by mail-il1-f197.google.com with SMTP id z6-20020a92cd060000b02901eb52fdfd60so7153481iln.14 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:06:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7qikh23JQj0rOROM36I+xJmZ0dRjFa9wyjTVsnQCQJc=; b=JQH+5TOsWA0oRRIBpq9G5ku5wsu+TEJPsATNF6NhajWfn5rqU/KyFRtDUaK9FfB3Oz a150xCcEuYz3adONEtFC+TuxINanaeXVwXHKx+s5r21/ggoP0KK5xP0ai0L8IZ8D9ynY xxdB2u+Tjon0xXu48N4PgATWZ0l0v3BmisdTmMpO2Wj43uM9u2j0irRzA6d9wsQlYwOV bb68w94JLhewPgIkF8f2ZWtABDi33mw5J0+jTVaDzzMumxqe3ejZ/bpgP40QYv0zYPDT kEs1hOj+MvgPSw5sutamtkzIVZt0/gLUYsg4tXl0zyXlKoR6F6NgltlfW/SHXA9RYI/E bCAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UyEpFdc+5zU0pqq4C6acfQN/KOlMVskQzCZuh5FkEiOJPzv+A InaV6WDND3XE0CSUbGfnF1MBsDjK37CZd9Z6REDxBof654OG6/Xd7I+1KUanrv+05iYOnvdsINx AQuyxOKg31ixP8mIpnpXytEbM49UJyy0yuDeKBw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:c705:: with SMTP id a5mr20822431ilp.36.1623186391213; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:06:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPlJ3clujIQ13+n5JELKQhbjZ0YSViAsoCnIB1CIWy/ekJ0Gr0mf1G/mdwsIQlBaMZ/VjAhfKUDPJenEOXaXU= X-Received: by 2002:a92:c705:: with SMTP id a5mr20822396ilp.36.1623186390733; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:06:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6b4027c4-7c25-fa98-42bc-f5b3a55e1d5a@novek.ru> In-Reply-To: <6b4027c4-7c25-fa98-42bc-f5b3a55e1d5a@novek.ru> From: Alexander Aring Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:06:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: quic in-kernel implementation? To: Vadim Fedorenko Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, smfrench@gmail.com, Leif Sahlberg , Steven Whitehouse Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Hi Vadim, On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:59 PM Vadim Fedorenko wrote: > > On 07.06.2021 16:25, Alexander Ahring Oder Aring wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as I notice there exists several quic user space implementations, is > > there any interest or process of doing an in-kernel implementation? I > > am asking because I would like to try out quic with an in-kernel > > application protocol like DLM. Besides DLM I've heard that the SMB > > community is also interested into such implementation. > > > > - Alex > > > > Hi! > I'm working on test in-kernel implementation of quic. It's based on the > kernel-tls work and uses the same ULP approach to setup connection > configuration. It's mostly about offload crypto operations of short header > to kernel and use user-space implementation to deal with any other types > of packets. Hope to test it till the end of June with some help from > Jakub. Thanks, sounds interesting. Does this allow the kernel to create a quic socket? - Alex