From: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
To: Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>,
linux-cifs <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:51:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKywueQhAOjPQoF2=LPmvBASeWmixM1dr6u_8_R70CZUdMawAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca15c743-11f0-ff36-6c66-23ad795cf293@redhat.com>
пн, 28 окт. 2019 г. в 05:13, Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>:
>
> On 10/26/19 4:04 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> > Steve, Pavel, Frank
> >
> > This patch moves the logic in cifsFileInfo_put() into a work-queue so that
> > it will be processed in a different thread which, importantly, does not hold
> > any other locks.
> >
> > This should address the deadlock that Frank reported in the thread:
> > Yet another hang after network disruption or smb restart -- multiple file writers
>
> Pavel,
>
> Thanks for understanding my report and translating it into what it meant.
>
> Ronnie,
> Thanks for the patch. I'm happy to say that my attempt at the same
> looks like it would have been similar, had I known what I was doing to
> begin with :)
>
>
> Unfortunately, I think the patch really only moves the problem from one
> place to another. I'm guessing that means we have a second underlying
> deadlock. (this reproducer appears to be quite effective)
>
>
> On the plus side, only the one file involved is jammed in the deadlock
> now, as opposed to the parent directory as well, so it is at least progress.
>
Hi Frank, Ronnie,
Ok, it seems there is another bug resulting in a deadlock between a
page lock and writeback (WB) flag in cifs_writev_complete and
cifs_writepages.
1) cifs_writev_complete. in the case of WB_SYNC_ALL and EAGAIN
(reconnect) it calls cifs_writev_requeue. At this point it still has
WB flag set for all the pages being retried. Inside
cifs_writev_requeue it tries to lock the page:
kworker/4:3+cifsiod
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 __lock_page at ffffffffaae3f66f
#4 cifs_writev_complete at ffffffffc07df762
#5 process_one_work at ffffffffaacecc11
#6 worker_thread at ffffffffaaced0f0
#7 kthread at ffffffffaacf2ac2
#8 ret_from_fork at ffffffffab600215
2) cifs_writepages. It locks the page and then waits on WB flag to be
cleared before processing pages:
1 openloop.sh
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 wait_on_page_bit at ffffffffaae3fbc6
#4 cifs_writepages at ffffffffc07ffc73
#5 do_writepages at ffffffffaae4ba71
#6 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffaae4321b
#7 filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffffaae432aa
#8 cifs_flush at ffffffffc0800fe3
#9 filp_close at ffffffffaaeed181
#10 do_dup2 at ffffffffaaf12c0b
#11 __x64_sys_dup2 at ffffffffaaf1306a
#12 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
The bug is in cifs_writev_complete and cifs_writev_requeue: the 1st
needs to clear the WB flag and re-dirty pages before trying to retry
the IO; the 2nd needs additionally to skip pages that are no longer
dirty (e.g. written by another thread) and re-set the WB flag before
sending pages over the wire.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-26 21:04 [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-26 21:04 ` [PATCH] " Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-28 23:18 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-29 3:09 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-27 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Frank Sorenson
2019-10-28 22:51 ` Pavel Shilovsky [this message]
2019-11-05 2:11 ` Deadlock between cifs_writev_requeue and cifs_writepages Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-29 3:13 [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-30 2:59 Ronnie Sahlberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKywueQhAOjPQoF2=LPmvBASeWmixM1dr6u_8_R70CZUdMawAA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=piastryyy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsahlber@redhat.com \
--cc=sorenson@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).