Linux-CIFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
@ 2019-10-24  2:08 Dave Wysochanski
  2019-10-24  2:57 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
  2019-10-24 22:22 ` Pavel Shilovsky
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dave Wysochanski @ 2019-10-24  2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-cifs

There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
and a disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due
a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time.  If in
between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
another process, deadlock occurs.

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
cifs_strict_readv()
 down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
                               _cifsFileInfo_put
                                  OR
                               cifs_new_fileinfo
                                down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
cifs_reopen_file()
 down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);

Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.

Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsglob.h |  5 +++++
 fs/cifs/file.c     | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 fs/cifs/smb2file.c |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index 50dfd9049370..2c4a7adbcb4e 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ struct cifs_writedata {
 struct cifsInodeInfo {
 	bool can_cache_brlcks;
 	struct list_head llist;	/* locks helb by this inode */
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
+	 * we must always use use down_write_trylock()/msleep() loop
+	 * to avoid deadlock.
+	 */
 	struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;	/* protect the fields above */
 	/* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
 	struct list_head openFileList;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 5ad15de2bb4f..52454df5ae39 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ struct cifsFileInfo *
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
 	fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
 	cfile->llist = fdlocks;
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
 	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 
@@ -464,7 +465,8 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
 	 * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
 	 * is closed anyway.
 	 */
-	down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cifsi->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
 		list_del(&li->llist);
 		cifs_del_lock_waiters(li);
@@ -1027,7 +1029,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
 {
 	struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
 	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 }
@@ -1049,7 +1052,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 
 try_again:
 	exist = false;
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 
 	exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
 					lock->type, lock->flags, &conf_lock,
@@ -1072,7 +1076,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 					(lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
 		if (!rc)
 			goto try_again;
-		down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+		while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+			msleep(125);
 		list_del_init(&lock->blist);
 	}
 
@@ -1125,7 +1130,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 		return rc;
 
 try_again:
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
 		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
@@ -1331,7 +1337,8 @@ struct lock_to_push {
 	int rc = 0;
 
 	/* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
 		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
@@ -1522,7 +1529,8 @@ struct lock_to_push {
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
 		cur = buf;
 		num = 0;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
index e6a1fc72018f..61f6cc8d9cc9 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
@@ -145,7 +145,8 @@
 
 	cur = buf;
 
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
 		if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
 		    (flock->fl_start + length) <
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
  2019-10-24  2:08 [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs Dave Wysochanski
@ 2019-10-24  2:57 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
  2019-10-24 22:22 ` Pavel Shilovsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-24  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Wysochanski; +Cc: linux-cifs

Reviewed-by me

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Wysochanski" <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2019 12:08:22 PM
Subject: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs

There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
and a disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due
a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time.  If in
between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
another process, deadlock occurs.

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
cifs_strict_readv()
 down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
                               _cifsFileInfo_put
                                  OR
                               cifs_new_fileinfo
                                down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
cifs_reopen_file()
 down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);

Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.

Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsglob.h |  5 +++++
 fs/cifs/file.c     | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 fs/cifs/smb2file.c |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index 50dfd9049370..2c4a7adbcb4e 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ struct cifs_writedata {
 struct cifsInodeInfo {
 	bool can_cache_brlcks;
 	struct list_head llist;	/* locks helb by this inode */
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
+	 * we must always use use down_write_trylock()/msleep() loop
+	 * to avoid deadlock.
+	 */
 	struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;	/* protect the fields above */
 	/* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
 	struct list_head openFileList;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 5ad15de2bb4f..52454df5ae39 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ struct cifsFileInfo *
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
 	fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
 	cfile->llist = fdlocks;
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
 	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 
@@ -464,7 +465,8 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
 	 * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
 	 * is closed anyway.
 	 */
-	down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cifsi->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
 		list_del(&li->llist);
 		cifs_del_lock_waiters(li);
@@ -1027,7 +1029,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
 {
 	struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
 	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 }
@@ -1049,7 +1052,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 
 try_again:
 	exist = false;
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 
 	exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
 					lock->type, lock->flags, &conf_lock,
@@ -1072,7 +1076,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 					(lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
 		if (!rc)
 			goto try_again;
-		down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+		while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+			msleep(125);
 		list_del_init(&lock->blist);
 	}
 
@@ -1125,7 +1130,8 @@ int cifs_closedir(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 		return rc;
 
 try_again:
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
 		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
@@ -1331,7 +1337,8 @@ struct lock_to_push {
 	int rc = 0;
 
 	/* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
 		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
@@ -1522,7 +1529,8 @@ struct lock_to_push {
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
 		cur = buf;
 		num = 0;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
index e6a1fc72018f..61f6cc8d9cc9 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
@@ -145,7 +145,8 @@
 
 	cur = buf;
 
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
+		msleep(125);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
 		if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
 		    (flock->fl_start + length) <
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
  2019-10-24  2:08 [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs Dave Wysochanski
  2019-10-24  2:57 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-24 22:22 ` Pavel Shilovsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2019-10-24 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Wysochanski; +Cc: linux-cifs

чт, 24 окт. 2019 г. в 04:04, Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>:
>
> There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
> a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
> and a disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due
> a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
> obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
> cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time.  If in
> between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
> another process, deadlock occurs.
>
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
> cifs_strict_readv()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>                                _cifsFileInfo_put
>                                   OR
>                                cifs_new_fileinfo
>                                 down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> cifs_reopen_file()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>
> Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
> down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
> makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
> block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h |  5 +++++
>  fs/cifs/file.c     | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  fs/cifs/smb2file.c |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index 50dfd9049370..2c4a7adbcb4e 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ struct cifs_writedata {
>  struct cifsInodeInfo {
>         bool can_cache_brlcks;
>         struct list_head llist; /* locks helb by this inode */
> +       /*
> +        * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
> +        * we must always use use down_write_trylock()/msleep() loop
> +        * to avoid deadlock.
> +        */
>         struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;   /* protect the fields above */
>         /* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
>         struct list_head openFileList;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 5ad15de2bb4f..52454df5ae39 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ struct cifsFileInfo *
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
>         fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
>         cfile->llist = fdlocks;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       while (!down_write_trylock(&cinode->lock_sem))
> +               msleep(125);
>         list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
> @@ -464,7 +465,8 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
>          * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
>          * is closed anyway.
>          */
> -       down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> +       while (!down_write_trylock(&cifsi->lock_sem))
> +               msleep(125);

Please wrap the above code into a helper function e.g.
cifs_acquire_lock_sem(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode) or any other name
you like.

Other than that it looks good.

--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
  2019-10-25 15:38     ` Pavel Shilovskiy
@ 2019-10-25 15:41       ` Pavel Shilovskiy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovskiy @ 2019-10-25 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Shilovskiy, David Wysochanski, Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs

...continuing my email:

"I still think the right way to fix it would be to put "reconnected" file handles into a new queue and make another thread to "relock" the file."
But this approach requires much more work and it will involve more regression risks. So, I think the current patch is good for now.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Pavel Shilovskiy
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 8:39 AM
To: David Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>; Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs

Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>

I still think the right way to fix it would be to put "reconnected" file handles into a new queue and make another thread to "relock" the file.

It seems like a stable kernel candidate but I would hold off and let it bake a little bit in the mainline before we consider doing that.

Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of David Wysochanski
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 6:23 PM
To: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:51 PM Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
>
> There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with a test 
> where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file and a 
> disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due a reader 
> thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and obtaining 
> lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside cifs_reopen_file calling 
> down_read a second time.  If in between the two down_read calls, a 
> down_write comes from another process, deadlock occurs.
>
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
> cifs_strict_readv()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>                                _cifsFileInfo_put
>                                   OR
>                                cifs_new_fileinfo
>                                 down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> cifs_reopen_file()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>
> Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
> down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn makes the 
> second down_read call benign since it will never block behind the 
> writer while holding lock_sem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |  5 +++++
>  fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |  1 +
>  fs/cifs/file.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  fs/cifs/smb2file.c  |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h index
> 50dfd9049370..d78bfcc19156 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo 
> *cifs_file);  struct cifsInodeInfo {
>         bool can_cache_brlcks;
>         struct list_head llist; /* locks helb by this inode */
> +       /*
> +        * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
> +        * we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
> +        * for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
> +        */
>         struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;   /* protect the fields above */
>         /* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
>         struct list_head openFileList; diff --git 
> a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h index
> e53e9f62b87b..fe597d3d5208 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ extern int cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile,
>                              struct file_lock *flock, const unsigned 
> int xid);  extern int cifs_push_mandatory_locks(struct cifsFileInfo 
> *cfile);
>
> +extern void cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
>  extern struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
>                                               struct file *file,
>                                               struct tcon_link *tlink, 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index
> 0e0217641de1..a80ec683ea32 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ cifs_has_mand_locks(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode)
>         return has_locks;
>  }
>
> +void
> +cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) {
> +       while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
> +               msleep(10);
> +}
> +
>  struct cifsFileInfo *
>  cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
>                   struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock) @@ -306,7
> +313,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
>         fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
>         cfile->llist = fdlocks;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
> @@ -464,7 +471,7 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
>          * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
>          * is closed anyway.
>          */
> -       down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
>                 list_del(&li->llist);
>                 cifs_del_lock_waiters(li); @@ -1027,7 +1034,7 @@ 
> static void  cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct 
> cifsLockInfo *lock)  {
>         struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>  }
> @@ -1049,7 +1056,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, 
> struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
>
>  try_again:
>         exist = false;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
>         exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
>                                         lock->type, lock->flags, 
> &conf_lock, @@ -1072,7 +1079,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
>                                         (lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
>                 if (!rc)
>                         goto try_again;
> -               down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +               cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 list_del_init(&lock->blist);
>         }
>
> @@ -1125,7 +1132,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock)
>                 return rc;
>
>  try_again:
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
>                 up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 return rc;
> @@ -1331,7 +1338,7 @@ cifs_push_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
>         int rc = 0;
>
>         /* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
>                 up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 return rc;
> @@ -1522,7 +1529,7 @@ cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct file_lock *flock,
>         if (!buf)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>                 cur = buf;
>                 num = 0;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c index
> e6a1fc72018f..8b0b512c5792 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ smb2_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, 
> struct file_lock *flock,
>
>         cur = buf;
>
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
>                 if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
>                     (flock->fl_start + length) <
> --
> 2.13.6
>

Thanks for doing this!  Looks fine to me.

I'm not loving this approach to solve this problem but I understand why it may be preferred right now.
I note that trylock with a sleep / retry loop is not often used in filesystems that I could tell (though it is used in drivers), so maybe this can be improved another day.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
  2019-10-25  1:23   ` David Wysochanski
@ 2019-10-25 15:38     ` Pavel Shilovskiy
  2019-10-25 15:41       ` Pavel Shilovskiy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovskiy @ 2019-10-25 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Wysochanski, Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs

Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>

I still think the right way to fix it would be to put "reconnected" file handles into a new queue and make another thread to "relock" the file.

It seems like a stable kernel candidate but I would hold off and let it bake a little bit in the mainline before we consider doing that.

Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of David Wysochanski
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 6:23 PM
To: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:51 PM Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
>
> There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with a test 
> where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file and a 
> disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due a reader 
> thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and obtaining 
> lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside cifs_reopen_file calling 
> down_read a second time.  If in between the two down_read calls, a 
> down_write comes from another process, deadlock occurs.
>
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
> cifs_strict_readv()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>                                _cifsFileInfo_put
>                                   OR
>                                cifs_new_fileinfo
>                                 down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> cifs_reopen_file()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>
> Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
> down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn makes the 
> second down_read call benign since it will never block behind the 
> writer while holding lock_sem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |  5 +++++
>  fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |  1 +
>  fs/cifs/file.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  fs/cifs/smb2file.c  |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h index 
> 50dfd9049370..d78bfcc19156 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo 
> *cifs_file);  struct cifsInodeInfo {
>         bool can_cache_brlcks;
>         struct list_head llist; /* locks helb by this inode */
> +       /*
> +        * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
> +        * we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
> +        * for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
> +        */
>         struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;   /* protect the fields above */
>         /* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
>         struct list_head openFileList; diff --git 
> a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h index 
> e53e9f62b87b..fe597d3d5208 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ extern int cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile,
>                              struct file_lock *flock, const unsigned 
> int xid);  extern int cifs_push_mandatory_locks(struct cifsFileInfo 
> *cfile);
>
> +extern void cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
>  extern struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
>                                               struct file *file,
>                                               struct tcon_link *tlink, 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index 
> 0e0217641de1..a80ec683ea32 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ cifs_has_mand_locks(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode)
>         return has_locks;
>  }
>
> +void
> +cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) {
> +       while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
> +               msleep(10);
> +}
> +
>  struct cifsFileInfo *
>  cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
>                   struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock) @@ -306,7 
> +313,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
>         fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
>         cfile->llist = fdlocks;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
> @@ -464,7 +471,7 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
>          * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
>          * is closed anyway.
>          */
> -       down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
>                 list_del(&li->llist);
>                 cifs_del_lock_waiters(li); @@ -1027,7 +1034,7 @@ 
> static void  cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct 
> cifsLockInfo *lock)  {
>         struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>  }
> @@ -1049,7 +1056,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, 
> struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
>
>  try_again:
>         exist = false;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
>         exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
>                                         lock->type, lock->flags, 
> &conf_lock, @@ -1072,7 +1079,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
>                                         (lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
>                 if (!rc)
>                         goto try_again;
> -               down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +               cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 list_del_init(&lock->blist);
>         }
>
> @@ -1125,7 +1132,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock)
>                 return rc;
>
>  try_again:
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
>                 up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 return rc;
> @@ -1331,7 +1338,7 @@ cifs_push_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
>         int rc = 0;
>
>         /* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
>                 up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 return rc;
> @@ -1522,7 +1529,7 @@ cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct file_lock *flock,
>         if (!buf)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>                 cur = buf;
>                 num = 0;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c index 
> e6a1fc72018f..8b0b512c5792 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ smb2_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, 
> struct file_lock *flock,
>
>         cur = buf;
>
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
>                 if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
>                     (flock->fl_start + length) <
> --
> 2.13.6
>

Thanks for doing this!  Looks fine to me.

I'm not loving this approach to solve this problem but I understand why it may be preferred right now.
I note that trylock with a sleep / retry loop is not often used in filesystems that I could tell (though it is used in drivers), so maybe this can be improved another day.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
  2019-10-24 23:51 ` [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-25  1:23   ` David Wysochanski
  2019-10-25 15:38     ` Pavel Shilovskiy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Wysochanski @ 2019-10-25  1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:51 PM Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
>
> There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
> a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
> and a disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due
> a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
> obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
> cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time.  If in
> between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
> another process, deadlock occurs.
>
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
> cifs_strict_readv()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>                                _cifsFileInfo_put
>                                   OR
>                                cifs_new_fileinfo
>                                 down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> cifs_reopen_file()
>  down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>
> Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
> down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
> makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
> block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |  5 +++++
>  fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |  1 +
>  fs/cifs/file.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  fs/cifs/smb2file.c  |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index 50dfd9049370..d78bfcc19156 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
>  struct cifsInodeInfo {
>         bool can_cache_brlcks;
>         struct list_head llist; /* locks helb by this inode */
> +       /*
> +        * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
> +        * we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
> +        * for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
> +        */
>         struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;   /* protect the fields above */
>         /* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
>         struct list_head openFileList;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> index e53e9f62b87b..fe597d3d5208 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ extern int cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile,
>                              struct file_lock *flock, const unsigned int xid);
>  extern int cifs_push_mandatory_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
>
> +extern void cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
>  extern struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
>                                               struct file *file,
>                                               struct tcon_link *tlink,
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 0e0217641de1..a80ec683ea32 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ cifs_has_mand_locks(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode)
>         return has_locks;
>  }
>
> +void
> +cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> +{
> +       while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
> +               msleep(10);
> +}
> +
>  struct cifsFileInfo *
>  cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
>                   struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock)
> @@ -306,7 +313,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
>         fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
>         cfile->llist = fdlocks;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
> @@ -464,7 +471,7 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
>          * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
>          * is closed anyway.
>          */
> -       down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
>                 list_del(&li->llist);
>                 cifs_del_lock_waiters(li);
> @@ -1027,7 +1034,7 @@ static void
>  cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
>  {
>         struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
>         up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>  }
> @@ -1049,7 +1056,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
>
>  try_again:
>         exist = false;
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>
>         exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
>                                         lock->type, lock->flags, &conf_lock,
> @@ -1072,7 +1079,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
>                                         (lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
>                 if (!rc)
>                         goto try_again;
> -               down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +               cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 list_del_init(&lock->blist);
>         }
>
> @@ -1125,7 +1132,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock)
>                 return rc;
>
>  try_again:
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
>                 up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 return rc;
> @@ -1331,7 +1338,7 @@ cifs_push_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
>         int rc = 0;
>
>         /* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
>                 up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>                 return rc;
> @@ -1522,7 +1529,7 @@ cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct file_lock *flock,
>         if (!buf)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>                 cur = buf;
>                 num = 0;
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> index e6a1fc72018f..8b0b512c5792 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ smb2_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct file_lock *flock,
>
>         cur = buf;
>
> -       down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
> +       cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
>         list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
>                 if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
>                     (flock->fl_start + length) <
> --
> 2.13.6
>

Thanks for doing this!  Looks fine to me.

I'm not loving this approach to solve this problem but I understand
why it may be preferred right now.
I note that trylock with a sleep / retry loop is not often used in
filesystems that I could tell (though it is used in drivers), so maybe
this can be improved another day.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
  2019-10-24 23:51 Updated patch for the the lock_sem deadlock Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-24 23:51 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
  2019-10-25  1:23   ` David Wysochanski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-24 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-cifs; +Cc: Dave Wysochanski

From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>

There's a deadlock that is possible and can easily be seen with
a test where multiple readers open/read/close of the same file
and a disruption occurs causing reconnect.  The deadlock is due
a reader thread inside cifs_strict_readv calling down_read and
obtaining lock_sem, and then after reconnect inside
cifs_reopen_file calling down_read a second time.  If in
between the two down_read calls, a down_write comes from
another process, deadlock occurs.

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
cifs_strict_readv()
 down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);
                               _cifsFileInfo_put
                                  OR
                               cifs_new_fileinfo
                                down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
cifs_reopen_file()
 down_read(&cifsi->lock_sem);

Fix the above by changing all down_write(lock_sem) calls to
down_write_trylock(lock_sem)/msleep() loop, which in turn
makes the second down_read call benign since it will never
block behind the writer while holding lock_sem.

Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |  5 +++++
 fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |  1 +
 fs/cifs/file.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 fs/cifs/smb2file.c  |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index 50dfd9049370..d78bfcc19156 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1391,6 +1391,11 @@ void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
 struct cifsInodeInfo {
 	bool can_cache_brlcks;
 	struct list_head llist;	/* locks helb by this inode */
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: Some code paths call down_read(lock_sem) twice, so
+	 * we must always use use cifs_down_write() instead of down_write()
+	 * for this semaphore to avoid deadlocks.
+	 */
 	struct rw_semaphore lock_sem;	/* protect the fields above */
 	/* BB add in lists for dirty pages i.e. write caching info for oplock */
 	struct list_head openFileList;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
index e53e9f62b87b..fe597d3d5208 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ extern int cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile,
 			     struct file_lock *flock, const unsigned int xid);
 extern int cifs_push_mandatory_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
 
+extern void cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
 extern struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid,
 					      struct file *file,
 					      struct tcon_link *tlink,
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 0e0217641de1..a80ec683ea32 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -281,6 +281,13 @@ cifs_has_mand_locks(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode)
 	return has_locks;
 }
 
+void
+cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	while (!down_write_trylock(sem))
+		msleep(10);
+}
+
 struct cifsFileInfo *
 cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
 		  struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock)
@@ -306,7 +313,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fdlocks->locks);
 	fdlocks->cfile = cfile;
 	cfile->llist = fdlocks;
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	list_add(&fdlocks->llist, &cinode->llist);
 	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 
@@ -464,7 +471,7 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
 	 * Delete any outstanding lock records. We'll lose them when the file
 	 * is closed anyway.
 	 */
-	down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cifsi->lock_sem);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cifs_file->llist->locks, llist) {
 		list_del(&li->llist);
 		cifs_del_lock_waiters(li);
@@ -1027,7 +1034,7 @@ static void
 cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
 {
 	struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(d_inode(cfile->dentry));
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	list_add_tail(&lock->llist, &cfile->llist->locks);
 	up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 }
@@ -1049,7 +1056,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
 
 try_again:
 	exist = false;
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 
 	exist = cifs_find_lock_conflict(cfile, lock->offset, lock->length,
 					lock->type, lock->flags, &conf_lock,
@@ -1072,7 +1079,7 @@ cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
 					(lock->blist.next == &lock->blist));
 		if (!rc)
 			goto try_again;
-		down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+		cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		list_del_init(&lock->blist);
 	}
 
@@ -1125,7 +1132,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock)
 		return rc;
 
 try_again:
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
 		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
@@ -1331,7 +1338,7 @@ cifs_push_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
 	int rc = 0;
 
 	/* we are going to update can_cache_brlcks here - need a write access */
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	if (!cinode->can_cache_brlcks) {
 		up_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 		return rc;
@@ -1522,7 +1529,7 @@ cifs_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct file_lock *flock,
 	if (!buf)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
 		cur = buf;
 		num = 0;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
index e6a1fc72018f..8b0b512c5792 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2file.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ smb2_unlock_range(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct file_lock *flock,
 
 	cur = buf;
 
-	down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
+	cifs_down_write(&cinode->lock_sem);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(li, tmp, &cfile->llist->locks, llist) {
 		if (flock->fl_start > li->offset ||
 		    (flock->fl_start + length) <
-- 
2.13.6


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-24  2:08 [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs Dave Wysochanski
2019-10-24  2:57 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-24 22:22 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-24 23:51 Updated patch for the the lock_sem deadlock Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-24 23:51 ` [PATCH] cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-25  1:23   ` David Wysochanski
2019-10-25 15:38     ` Pavel Shilovskiy
2019-10-25 15:41       ` Pavel Shilovskiy

Linux-CIFS Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/0 linux-cifs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-cifs linux-cifs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs \
		linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-cifs

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git