RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"

[Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@microsoft.com>]

Hi Geert,

You can find the updated patches in the linux-cifs mailing list about an hour ago.
Titled: Multichannel patches

-----Original Message-----
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> 
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 4:39 PM
To: Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@microsoft.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>; linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org; linux-next@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"

Hi Shyam,

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:41 PM Shyam Prasad <Shyam.Prasad@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the email.
> I've already submitted the fix for this. You should see this fixed tomorrow.

Where can I find these submitted fixes?

As per linux-next policy[1], commits in linux-next should be posted to the relevant mailing list first, which is linux-cifs, AFAIK.

Thanks!

[1] https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flinux-next%2F20210430174733.5a31d0c6%40canb.auug.org.au%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7CShyam.Prasad%40microsoft.com%7C50e24fa9469045cee62208d9274937e2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637584017711363338%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=WVfbz5WhzyupDUljqSmxlyCdSZtOPcdGxwYpoyqYXqA%3D&amp;reserved=0

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 2:32 PM
> To: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>; Shyam Prasad 
> <Shyam.Prasad@microsoft.com>
> Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org; linux-next@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH] cifs: Change cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index to "unsigned long"
>
> On 32-bit (e.g. m68k):
>
>     fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: In function 'cifs_reconnect_tcon':
>     ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
>     fs/cifs/cifssmb.c:201:42: note: format string is defined here
>       201 |  cifs_dbg(FYI, "sess reconnect mask: 0x%lx, tcon reconnect: %d",
>           |                                        ~~^
>           |                                          |
>           |                                          long unsigned int
>           |                                        %x
>
>     fs/cifs/transport.c: In function 'cifs_pick_channel':
>     fs/cifs/cifsglob.h:955:20: error: passing argument 2 of 'test_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>       955 |  test_bit((index), &(ses)->chans_need_reconnect)
>           |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |                    |
>           |                    size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
>     ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:151:66: note: expected 'const volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
>       151 | static inline int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
>           |                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
>     fs/cifs/sess.c: In function 'cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect':
>     fs/cifs/sess.c:98:22: error: passing argument 2 of 'bset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>        98 |  set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
>           |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |                      |
>           |                      size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
>     ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:41:69: note: expected 'volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
>        41 | static inline void bset_mem_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
>           |                                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>     fs/cifs/sess.c:98:22: error: passing argument 2 of 'bfset_mem_set_bit' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>        98 |  set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
>           |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |                      |
>           |                      size_t * {aka unsigned int *}
>     ./arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h:50:70: note: expected 'volatile long unsigned int *' but argument is of type 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'}
>        50 | static inline void bfset_mem_set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *vaddr)
>           |                                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
>    [...]
>
> As bitops can only operate on long objects, and
> cifs_ses_get_chan_index() already returns "unsigned long", fix this by changing cifs_ses.chans_need_reconnect and chan_index from "size_t" to "unsigned long".
>
> Fixes: 374c6c7bba3cbaa1 ("cifs: changes to support multichannel during 
> channel reconnect")
> Reported-by: noreply@ellerman.id.au
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> ---
> Can you please add Link: headers when committing patches?
> I could not find this patch in the lore archives of linux-cifs or linux-fsdevel, presumably it was posted elsewhere?
> Thanks!
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 2 +-
>  fs/cifs/sess.c     | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h index 
> 8fea2ddd2bd7af26..a9c026af21e1e9d1 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ struct cifs_ses {
>          * enable the sessions on top to continue to live till any
>          * of the channels below are active.
>          */
> -       size_t chans_need_reconnect;
> +       unsigned long chans_need_reconnect;
>  };
>
>  static inline bool
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/sess.c b/fs/cifs/sess.c index 
> 1721a3b246942266..1a17ddd6abbe5778 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/sess.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/sess.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void
>  cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
>                              struct TCP_Server_Info *server)  {
> -       size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> +       unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, 
> + server);
>         set_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
>         cifs_dbg(FYI, "Set reconnect bitmask for chan %lu; now 0x%lx\n",
>                  chan_index, ses->chans_need_reconnect); @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void  cifs_chan_clear_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
>                                struct TCP_Server_Info *server)  {
> -       size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> +       unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, 
> + server);
>         clear_bit(chan_index, &ses->chans_need_reconnect);
>         cifs_dbg(FYI, "Cleared reconnect bitmask for chan %lu; now 0x%lx\n",
>                  chan_index, ses->chans_need_reconnect); @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ bool  cifs_chan_needs_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
>                             struct TCP_Server_Info *server)  {
> -       size_t chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
> +       unsigned long chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, 
> + server);
>         return CIFS_CHAN_NEEDS_RECONNECT(ses, chan_index);  }

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds