linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: samba-bugs@samba.org
To: cifs-qa@samba.org
Subject: [Bug 14713] SMBv3 negotiation fails with a Solaris server
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:03:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14713-10630-KXEmdYSK05@https.bugzilla.samba.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14713-10630@https.bugzilla.samba.org/>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14713

--- Comment #10 from Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> ---
Since the Solaris server logs:


May 24 23:09:46 nonsuch smbcmn: [ID 997540 kern.warning] WARNING:
../../common/fs/smbsrv/smb2_dispatch.c:smb2_dispatch_message:134:Decryption
failure (71)!

are you sure that you mounted without encryption (ie did not specify "seal=" on
mount)?

If this connection is defaulting to encryption whether or not the client
specifies it on mount, that implies that the server is configured with
encryption as required ... which is odd - because the server allowed vers=2.1
(which is not encrypted, encryption was added in the SMB3 and later versions of
the protocol and not supported with SMB2.1) but fails with vers=3.0 or 3.1.1
(smb3.1.1 is the typical default) which presumably means the server is
negotiating with encryption required (but only for a subset of dialects). 
Strange server configuration.

Can you send or attach the vers=3.1.1 (or default with no vers= specified)
wireshark trace so we can see what crypto algorithm the server is defaulting to
(even if we can't see the keys - we can see how it is trying to encrypt/decrypt
if smb3.1.1 is used instead of smb3.0)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-14713-10630@https.bugzilla.samba.org/>
2021-05-25 14:14 ` [Bug 14713] SMBv3 negotiation fails with a Solaris server samba-bugs
2021-05-25 18:19 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 18:26 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 18:51 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:03 ` samba-bugs [this message]
2021-05-25 19:09 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:09 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:13 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:19 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:27 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:37 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:42 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:43 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:47 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 20:31 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 20:38 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 20:55 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 21:40 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 22:33 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26  8:57 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26  9:00 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26  9:47 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 15:36 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 18:59 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 21:51 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 21:54 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 22:09 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 22:26 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 22:39 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-27 17:33 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-30 13:51 ` samba-bugs
2021-06-04  6:42 ` samba-bugs
2021-06-04 10:17 ` samba-bugs
2022-02-20 19:07 ` samba-bugs
2022-05-11 18:46 ` samba-bugs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-14713-10630-KXEmdYSK05@https.bugzilla.samba.org/ \
    --to=samba-bugs@samba.org \
    --cc=cifs-qa@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).