From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599B6C4707F for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 20:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CF961409 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 20:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233279AbhEYUk0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 16:40:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46472 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233263AbhEYUk0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 16:40:26 -0400 Received: from hr2.samba.org (hr2.samba.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:192:486::2:0]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D424BC061574 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 13:38:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samba.org; s=42; h=Message-ID:Date:To:From:CC; bh=gZ5+CnenhT65UZDkTF3+O7O7Gxbw69kADBWustogCU0=; b=mFVYFnXQ9oWb2NY9GGz3JcUdk8 69LHLJxvOdWxNjF1FtDoRy+dWhgKsdUFIJ7/7wPt0T+OtUtHPj+7TvU0rjneTuViVVdsZQWSvmuK/ k1nz+bwD4S68yroZlJ9mJpTLrB78IwKrhquARzSql/NJXIUfNFyjXyvJ9UbV1n5L79c5zsKwAGHDC tjQkEoB/KUZ9dy/r28mEW+B/xkSxbkMBHZYcNT2kGQDFvmcs+FGosRG4KcFAR32DA0EZn29hzmiU0 RnI4fK6URS31XF+YscO0d4cBuhBnQQyktcfSwvgxX/5+jPvqB5lCXCHvHeTu/mFQA++RIVWhzFNO0 FF0z7lUwYZ5sxGK6wSc7j++XgenZZzwTmhwBiKD3fKGV88O3oRt0NpWvP7/6jVJuxUZuXPqcumT6b ddjbBSJerQmqjJLpawSot2RLM8VdXckZMZ6z0KP4DfMYDO8zpCbSv6yzhGZDhUOFoyZFU9HC5KklL UrRFkSy6FJSQ+cJF44lrfvmI; Received: from [2a01:4f8:192:486::6:0] (port=55996 helo=hr6.samba.org) by hr2.samba.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim) id 1lldpF-0007Dk-QL for cifs-qa@samba.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 20:38:53 +0000 Received: from [::1] (port=33880 helo=bugzilla.samba.org) by hr6.samba.org with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lldpF-008k0Z-8e for cifs-qa@samba.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 20:38:53 +0000 From: samba-bugs@samba.org To: cifs-qa@samba.org Subject: [Bug 14713] SMBv3 negotiation fails with a Solaris server Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 20:38:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: QAcontact X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: CifsVFS X-Bugzilla-Component: kernel fs X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.x X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sfrench@samba.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sfrench@samba.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.samba.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14713 --- Comment #21 from Steve French --- Key next steps: 1) seeing if it is possible to decrypt the wireshark trace (see link provid= ed earlier for instructions) although this may require rebuilding the cifs.ko = to dump keys (does Solaris have a way to view encrypted traces taken on the se= rver side?) 2) looking in more detail at the server. It doesn't indicate why it was rejected: ./../common/fs/smbsrv/smb2_dispatch.c:smb2_dispatch_message:134:Decryption failure (71)! May 25 19:44:21 nonsuch smbcmn: [ID 997540 kern.warning] WARNING: ../../common/fs/smbsrv/smb2_dispatch.c:smb2_dispatch_message:134:Decryption failure (72)! Do you have any contacts with Solaris support to see if they can see if they can provide more information? My guess is that they don't like the format = or the flags of something specified in the tree connect (since this works to e= very other server type) - but they may also have some subtle rounding error with decryption on their server side. Googling for the error I do see one other report of similar sounding proble= m to Solaris so it has been around a long time (see https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3D16531) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.=