linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: samba-bugs@samba.org
To: cifs-qa@samba.org
Subject: [Bug 14713] SMBv3 negotiation fails with a Solaris server
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 22:39:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-14713-10630-l1JCiYZOAg@https.bugzilla.samba.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14713-10630@https.bugzilla.samba.org/>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14713

--- Comment #34 from Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com> ---
Signing.  It is not required on the server config,

BUT in 3.1.1 signing is required for all TreeConnect calls (0x03) always, by
the protocol.

In 3.0 and 3.0.2 signing is required for all
Ioctl:fsctl_validate_negotiate_info calls. Also by protocol requirements.

The command code for Ioctl is 0x0b, which you saw in the log.


At least it got the mount process a bit further by using vers=3.0 since we got
past the TreeConnect.   I forgot that in 3.0 we have that Ioctl call.
It could have worked, but I forgot about the Ioctl :-(


Anyway, this is another datapoint that tells us that the issue is that it is
related to the session key imo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-26 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-14713-10630@https.bugzilla.samba.org/>
2021-05-25 14:14 ` [Bug 14713] SMBv3 negotiation fails with a Solaris server samba-bugs
2021-05-25 18:19 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 18:26 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 18:51 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:03 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:09 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:09 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:13 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:19 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:27 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:37 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:42 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:43 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 19:47 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 20:31 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 20:38 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 20:55 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 21:40 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-25 22:33 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26  8:57 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26  9:00 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26  9:47 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 15:36 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 18:59 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 21:51 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 21:54 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 22:09 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 22:26 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-26 22:39 ` samba-bugs [this message]
2021-05-27 17:33 ` samba-bugs
2021-05-30 13:51 ` samba-bugs
2021-06-04  6:42 ` samba-bugs
2021-06-04 10:17 ` samba-bugs
2022-02-20 19:07 ` samba-bugs
2022-05-11 18:46 ` samba-bugs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-14713-10630-l1JCiYZOAg@https.bugzilla.samba.org/ \
    --to=samba-bugs@samba.org \
    --cc=cifs-qa@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).