From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EDBC433DF for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BA420672 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="Ve9NjKCV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387695AbgF3Mbv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:31:51 -0400 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]:64113 "EHLO mail29.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732804AbgF3Mbt (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:31:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1593520309; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=k0MdTyKtV4z22dAVkmjS3nxPgaMUlZ3id20kmVJEhWM=; b=Ve9NjKCV/1JiJEE7Md0yCBpAFxTGZDycuUXMQkrDKIbMUAq3N3bnwcYWB6+Xo3pen+xDlIRl 4Q5NoDzK/RJ1VJcBben5t7OAcRqSeBQ1irZobOvRJrc1xc0wzO/mfjjm7tp0paCtEFCrBb/3 NxjtzXMRXL2ifpdidac6h3wgQ/I= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI4MzlhZiIsICJsaW51eC1jbGtAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n13.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5efb30b1c4bb4f886db6ea4d (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:31:45 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4C166C4339C; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gokulsri) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A0D0C433C8; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 12:31:43 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:01:43 +0530 From: gokulsri@codeaurora.org To: gokulsri@codeaurora.org, sboyd@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, ohad@wizery.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org, nprakash@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/10] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-wcss: Add support for secure pil In-Reply-To: <1589362265-22702-1-git-send-email-gokulsri@codeaurora.org> References: <1589362265-22702-1-git-send-email-gokulsri@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <14579d9dbcc06bca392b41ace1b0ce49@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: gokulsri@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, My below patch series (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11545511/) with all the review comments addressed and this is on top of Govind's series (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11060629/) "[v5] "Add non PAS wcss Q6 support for QCS404". Need your help to know how should I proceed further to merge these patches. Regards, Gokul On 2020-05-13 15:00, Gokul Sriram Palanisamy wrote: > IPQ8074 needs support for secure pil as well. > Also, currently only unified firmware is supported. > IPQ8074 supports split firmware for q6 and m3, so > adding support for that. > > This series is based on Govind's > "[v5] Add non PAS wcss Q6 support for QCS404" > > changes since v4: > - Rebased patch 8 > > changes since v3: > - In patch 10, Added release_firmware to free up > memory requested for m3 firmware. > > changes since v2: > - In patch 5, Added a driver data 'bcr_reset_required' > to select if bcr reset is required > - In patch 10, Removed syscon implementation and moved > to mailbox framework to access APCS IPC > > changes since v1: > - In patch 10, Addressed minor review comments. > > Gokul Sriram Palanisamy (10): > remoteproc: qcom: Add PRNG proxy clock > remoteproc: qcom: Add secure PIL support > remoteproc: qcom: Add support for split q6 + m3 wlan firmware > remoteproc: qcom: Add ssr subdevice identifier > remoteproc: qcom: Update regmap offsets for halt register > dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add reset for WCSSAON > clk: qcom: Add WCSSAON reset > dt-bindings: firmware: qcom: Add compatible for IPQ8074 SoC > arm64: dts: Add support for scm on IPQ8074 SoCs > arm64: dts: qcom: Enable Q6v5 WCSS for ipq8074 SoC > > .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.txt | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 127 > +++++++++++++++++ > drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq8074.c | 1 + > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 157 > +++++++++++++++++---- > include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq8074.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)