From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matti Vaittinen , Rob Herring From: Stephen Boyd In-Reply-To: Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Michael Turquette , Mark Rutland , Lee Jones , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , linux-clk , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , mikko.mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com References: <3b05ca98a671a762013c312f8b70543402ee7556.1527669443.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> <20180531030129.GA16122@rob-hp-laptop> <20180531071717.GG13528@localhost.localdomain> <20180531102315.GA5150@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <152777867392.144038.18188452389972834689@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mfd: bd71837: Devicetree bindings for ROHM BD71837 PMIC Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 07:57:53 -0700 List-ID: Quoting Rob Herring (2018-05-31 07:07:24) > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Matti Vaittinen > wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:17:17AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > >> Hello Rob, > >> > >> Thanks for the review! > >> > >> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:01:29PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:42:03AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > >> > > Document devicetree bindings for ROHM BD71837 PMIC MFD. > >> > > + - interrupts : The interrupt line the device is conne= cted to. > >> > > + - interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt = controller. > >> > > >> > What sub blocks have interrupts? > >> > >> The PMIC can generate interrupts from events which cause it to reset. > >> Eg, irq from watchdog line change, power button pushes, reset request > >> via register interface etc. I don't know any generic handling for these > >> interrupts. In "normal" use-case this PMIC is powering the processor > >> where driver is running and I do not see reasonable handling because > >> power-reset is going to follow the irq. > >> > > > > Oh, but when reading this I understand that the interrupt-controller > > property should at least be optional. > = > I don't think it should. The h/w either has an interrupt controller or > it doesn't. My concern is you added it but nothing uses it which tells > me your binding is incomplete. I'd rather see complete bindings even > if you don't have drivers. For example, as-is, there's not really any > need for the clocks child node. You can just make the parent a clock > provider. But we need a complete picture of the h/w to make that > determination. > = I don't see a reason to have the clk subnode either.