From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mturquette@baylibre.com" , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Anson Huang , Fabio Estevam , Jerome Forissier , Peng Fan , Rob Herring From: Stephen Boyd In-Reply-To: Cc: dl-linux-imx References: <1533703167-26583-1-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> <1533703167-26583-2-git-send-email-Anson.Huang@nxp.com> <153567894721.93865.4092113232222931488@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Message-ID: <153573827629.93865.6200966443862432044@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove clks_init_on array Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:57:56 -0700 List-ID: Quoting Jerome Forissier (2018-08-31 01:01:44) > = > = > On 08/31/2018 03:29 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Peng Fan (2018-08-12 18:15:41) > >> Hi Anson, > >> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Anson Huang > >>>>> Sent: 2018=E5=B9=B48=E6=9C=888=E6=97=A5 12:39 > >>>>> To: shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; > >>>>> kernel@pengutronix.de; Fabio Estevam ; > >>>>> mturquette@baylibre.com; sboyd@kernel.org; > >>>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > >>>>> linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>>>> Cc: dl-linux-imx > >>>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: imx: imx7d: remove clks_init_on array > >>>>> > >>>>> Clock framework will enable those clocks registered with > >>>>> CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag, so no need to have clks_init_on array during > >>>>> clock > >>>> initialization now. > >>>> > >>>> Will it be more flexible to parse dts saying "critical-clocks =3D " > >>>> or "init-on-arrary=3D" > >>>> and enable those clocks? > >>> > >>> Parsing the clocks arrays from dtb is another way of enabling critica= l clocks, but > >>> for current i.MX6/7 platforms, we implement it in same way as most of= other > >>> SoCs, currently I did NOT see any necessity of putting them in dtb, j= ust adding > >>> flag during clock registering is more simple, if there is any special= requirement > >>> for different clocks set to be enabled, then we can add support to en= able the > >>> method of parsing critical-clocks from dtb. Just my two cents. > >> > >> Thinking about OP-TEE want to use one device, but it's clocks are regi= stered > >> by Linux, because there is no module in Linux side use it, it will shu= tdown the clock, > >> which cause OP-TEE could not access the device. > >> > >> Then people have to modify clk code to add CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag to mak= e sure > >> the clocks are not shutdown by Linux. > >> > >> However adding a new property in clk node and let driver code parse th= e dts, > >> there is no need to modify clk driver code when OP-TEE needs another d= evice clock. > >> > > = > > If OP-TEE needs linux to keep things on then why can't the OP-TEE driver > > in Linux probe, acquire clocks, and keep the clks enabled forever? > = > Sounds reasonable, but how could this be done without introducing > platform-specific stuff in the OP-TEE driver? > = Why is that a goal?