From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D17FC67839 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB5220870 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:04:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544738652; bh=oFbVQf52DmAIyJr+d31487v9PZakzmy0brakd4X3SRk=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Date:List-ID:From; b=YI3fsKfArksFRs81+iy1jqYhPJT1cAuTbvBUAZhCrU0ing55zOgLCyfsptXNRmRMG 4UdOUsDO8Imbsk2hmcvkOB8n3H50ys3IBH8J/bV27eRVxzGSnVw70voOvNz0iTIhxU TOmcJ69VcOiRL7b6xtUfUBDMPz7iwOaHJzRJ0DO0= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1FB5220870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727654AbeLMWEL (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:04:11 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36516 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727604AbeLMWEL (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:04:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A38E320811; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:04:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544738650; bh=oFbVQf52DmAIyJr+d31487v9PZakzmy0brakd4X3SRk=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Date:From; b=dRyPqZxyRpxuNzYDZakK0/cp3yuCvuPdKK91bOinJT3mJ8GV6eqyBzG2Y7ckignJB tAKHyRzVnA1GpaA4boOiluc9rjgDF81EJFhN/ZN6sC0dsqCrdClhCsyngdq1z02LZ1 Z2y7O2/6gcpr/fkyMHrFS9QexgnVl8beKTEY84Tw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH] clk: imx: Make the i.MX8MQ CCM clock driver CLK_IMX8MQ dependant To: Abel Vesa , Aisheng Dong , Daniel Baluta References: <1544717789-27388-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> Message-ID: <154473864987.19322.9053094167554135382@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.8 Cc: "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fabio Estevam , dl-linux-imx , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "olof@lixom.net" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel , "l.stach@pengutronix.de" Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:04:09 -0800 Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Quoting Aisheng Dong (2018-12-13 08:51:18) > [...] >=20 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile > > > @@ -34,5 +34,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SX) +=3D clk-imx6sx.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6UL) +=3D clk-imx6ul.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D) +=3D clk-imx7d.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7ULP) +=3D clk-imx7ulp.o > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8MQ) +=3D clk-imx8mq.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_VF610) +=3D clk-vf610.o > > > + > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) +=3D clk-imx8mq.o > >=20 > > Nit: Do we want to keep CONFIG_ sorted? >=20 > IMHO It might be okay to make MX8 (ARM64) a new group to start > To get a clear separation. (Slightly not sorted due to VF610) > Anyway, it leaves to Stephen to make the judge. >=20 This is fine to split the two if they're not related. Just have a comment indicating this.