From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A1FC3B187 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6E92173E for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:23:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581549793; bh=TvICLvO9Snk4i7FuNgUQI0ItU+qw1IAxuj3QcAxRPM0=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:List-ID:From; b=ci0KnUqGA5b7q07R9ZiamN0yZm6KvOtswG5RCjm0QI/4jIbQDGMesJsIbnskoDE8E 8FVvqaipREsP8BXoAC3SQFmGsqCIUxOKIigTL3krJ4zsH8tfZijwIGbI76rwC6pRor UCiGXTG5sLqz7c1+S7NlQq5cpUoSiataFoKTKoAY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729132AbgBLXXK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:23:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33280 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727117AbgBLXXK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:23:10 -0500 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FB3020848; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:23:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581549789; bh=TvICLvO9Snk4i7FuNgUQI0ItU+qw1IAxuj3QcAxRPM0=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=1gdDaDj409R0nHzjEurNMPfxA0HIjFQdV+yJnpk9xhebX21Rx1UiXKxEDc0lZqi4R 7+1eZWfMS8M9vBOcMx4DAEKhSVkx1q5kdu0u9N22Exka94D4KVIaHMfuCFLsmmNB64 Xfm3fIbHaB3L3ljZcdTMkLViqSHmkjXd9GLNaAhE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <0101016eee224b83-b0577d24-8f51-4e1a-9afb-b3f518e5ba77-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <20191205002503.13088-1-masneyb@onstation.org> <20191205002503.13088-2-masneyb@onstation.org> <0101016eee224b83-b0577d24-8f51-4e1a-9afb-b3f518e5ba77-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle From: Stephen Boyd Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Masney , Taniya Das , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:08 -0800 Message-ID: <158154978850.184098.12366153456613977692@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Quoting Taniya Das (2019-12-09 20:47:35) > Hi Brian, >=20 > On 12/5/2019 5:54 AM, Brian Masney wrote: > > + d_reg_val =3D mask - (((mask - 17) * duty->num) / duty->den); > > + ret =3D __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(rcg, rcg->freq_tbl, > > + d_reg_val, duty->num, > > + duty->den); >=20 > The duty-cycle calculation is not accurate. > There is already a plan to submit the duty-cycle changes from my side. What are the plans to submit this? Should we expect to see this support in the next week? Month?