Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Add basic SoC support for mt6765

[Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>]

On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 18:12 +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC,
> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application.
> 
> Changes in V8:
> 1. Origin V7 patchset:
>    https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11370105/
>    Split origin V7 patchset into 2 patchset,
>    keep remain patches #2, #5, #6, and #7 in the same order as this
>    V8 patchset.
>    [v7,2/7] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add smi dts binding for Mediatek
>             MT6765 SoC
>    [v7,5/7] soc: mediatek: add MT6765 scpsys and subdomain support
>    [v7,6/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: add mt6765 support
>    [v7,7/7] arm64: defconfig: add CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6765_XXX clocks
> 
> Changes in V7:
> 1. Adapt V6's patchset to latest kernel tree 5.5-rc1.
>    Origin V6 patchset:
>    https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11041963/
> 2. Correct 2 clock-controller type in documentation:
>    mipi0 and venc_gcon.
>    [v7 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: mediatek: document clk bindings
> 3. Remove V6's patch 03 because it has been taken into 5.5-next-soc
>    [v6, 03/08] dt-bindings: mediatek: add MT6765 power dt-bindings
> 3. Update Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> for
>    [v6, 04/08] clk: mediatek: add mt6765 clock IDs
>    --> [v7, 03/07] clk: mediatek: add mt6765 clock IDs
> 4. Update SPDX tag for
>    [v6, 05/08] clk: mediatek: Add MT6765 clock support
>    --> [v7, 04/07] clk: mediatek: Add MT6765 clock support
> 
> Changes in V6:
> 1. Adapt V5's patchset to latest kernel tree.
>    Origin V5 patchset.
>    https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/963612/
> 2. Due to clk's common code has been submit by other platform,
>    this patch set will have dependencies with the following patchsets
>    as the following orders.
>    2.a. [v8,00/21] MT8183 IOMMU SUPPORT
>         https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11023585/
>    2.b. [v11,0/6] Add basic node support for Mediatek MT8183 SoC
>         https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10962385/
>    2.c. [v6,00/14] Mediatek MT8183 scpsys support
>         https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11005751/
> 3. Correct power related patches into dt-binding patches.
> 4. Re-order V5's 4/11, 6/11, and 7/11 due clk common code change
>    and make dependencies in order.
> 5. Update some commit message in clk related patches.
> 
> Changes in V5:
> 1. add clk support
> 
> Changes in V4:
> 1. add gic's settings in reg properties
> 2. remove some patches about dt-bindings since GKH already took them
> 
> Changes in V3:
> 1. split dt-binding document patchs
> 2. fix mt6765.dtsi warnings with W=12
> 3. remove uncessary PPI affinity for timer
> 4. add gicc base for gic dt node
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 1. fix clk properties in uart dts node
> 2. fix typo in submit title
> 3. add simple-bus in mt6765.dtsi
> 4. use correct SPDX license format
> 
> Mars Cheng (3):
>   dt-bindings: mediatek: Add smi dts binding for Mediatek MT6765 SoC
>   soc: mediatek: add MT6765 scpsys and subdomain support
>   arm64: dts: mediatek: add mt6765 support
> 
> Owen Chen (1):
>   arm64: defconfig: add CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6765_XXX clocks
> 
>  .../memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-common.txt     |    1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile              |    1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6765-evb.dts        |   33 +++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6765.dtsi           |  253 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig                       |    6 +
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c                  |  130 ++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 424 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6765-evb.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6765.dtsi
> 

Dear Matthias and Rob,

Just a remind of these patches related to MT6765.
Thanks for Stephen's help, the other clock related patches of MT6765 has
been already merged into 5.8-rc1. I've tested these v8 patches of MT6765
on 5.8-rc1 and seems they were able to be applied. Could you kindly help
to check if these patches were qualified to be merged into your tree?

Thanks a lot!

Best regards,
Macpaul Lin