From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEABC433DF for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DEE207DD for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:45:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593045924; bh=qZMq5gJSej3TYdXnXDxd78oe5ecr2fgkTSwTAEMkuXc=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:List-ID:From; b=gLqMZ9hOU9iQPsbZxqAqbQEkNUz2ndjXQ6kfhWBmbPVv8KQSwN9o5NWOY+SynADpJ JuQRebFSmABUIGoE9OGJm0v0nsvecD0bFU2b5HULSvB2mp6hGagATlPydw5/ph9HI2 YtruaB1HM2gUEE7m+olMLzL7NWO5hR0ATGo30XnU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388795AbgFYApY (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:45:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59196 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388776AbgFYApX (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:45:23 -0400 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29C2A20836; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:45:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593045923; bh=qZMq5gJSej3TYdXnXDxd78oe5ecr2fgkTSwTAEMkuXc=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=zQpxE6iCA2BvzNrf0GH6ywRl7/vLEG/6S6b+e5zXF94XFDBzFrZZMjto3Li2WafQT Bl3pU92oe3t6vjLjUbB+l8FQwy5j3Ou2lizezhPi58pSeUHytCpDb8qp641NZ9eZcq RbFhePXzlXeh1UOA9WHe3/s85ipiZq7T3dTUqPeo= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/27] clk: bcm: rpi: Split pllb clock hooks From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Stevenson , Tim Gover , Phil Elwell , Mike Turquette , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel , Maxime Ripard To: Maxime Ripard , Nicolas Saenz Julienne Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:45:22 -0700 Message-ID: <159304592256.62212.16244414120435895037@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-06-15 01:40:57) > The driver only supports the pllb for now and all the clock framework hoo= ks > are a mix of the generic firmware interface and the specifics of the pllb. > Since we will support more clocks in the future let's split the generic a= nd > specific hooks >=20 > Cc: Michael Turquette > Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd > Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > --- Applied to clk-next