From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEF1C65BAE for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC7920879 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:02:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544749325; bh=HJ0ED45XoTcHsaXKzDy/1nHCihraOcFc6jN+JVeybfc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=BS2dxXYnauXQ7oEw9dl6peI/LEQdptqAvDI6VqwoarWsvAeSJwnEFmBlnjw/h/XeY FLzQi3hdWHfBzsmtYz56f7r3m/GPl7ENkocBSgwfy1bt+0Cns7oWlgCFdCOJssFvKJ rGVZYA/+vrgn9WUrRlqEITBQ/0PyfQS4TeeDRjFQ= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DDC7920879 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728502AbeLNBCE (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:02:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51202 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727638AbeLNBCE (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:02:04 -0500 Received: from dragon (61-216-91-114.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.216.91.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 802842080F; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:02:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544749323; bh=HJ0ED45XoTcHsaXKzDy/1nHCihraOcFc6jN+JVeybfc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nsHNEtN4p/h1tSq93wsvH9bKEVANwwB38JlXRp6xGYnk5IvQ1vqgb8auRq0PdEGar Bz6d6gfK2u0E8AMdCLjRICAon8lBSdGj/i/xkmJy1/CECOyXEMkjZXgbkwcn/mtpp/ dLAlVYW/FtXUQEyoyY4b6WVdy7MXQI7Cl/qo88vA= Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:01:02 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Aisheng Dong Cc: Daniel Baluta , Abel Vesa , "sboyd@kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Fabio Estevam , dl-linux-imx , "kernel@pengutronix.de" , "olof@lixom.net" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel , "l.stach@pengutronix.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: Make the i.MX8MQ CCM clock driver CLK_IMX8MQ dependant Message-ID: <20181214010101.GA13243@dragon> References: <1544717789-27388-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 04:51:18PM +0000, Aisheng Dong wrote: > [...] > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile > > > @@ -34,5 +34,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SX) += clk-imx6sx.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6UL) += clk-imx6ul.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D) += clk-imx7d.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7ULP) += clk-imx7ulp.o > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_VF610) += clk-vf610.o > > > + > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o > > > > Nit: Do we want to keep CONFIG_ sorted? > > IMHO It might be okay to make MX8 (ARM64) a new group to start > To get a clear separation. (Slightly not sorted due to VF610) > Anyway, it leaves to Stephen to make the judge. I think Daniel is suggesting that we put CONFIG_CLK_IMX8MQ prior to CONFIG_SOC_IMX1, so that all CONFIG_CLK_xxx options go before CONFIG_SOC_xxx and the list is still naturally alphabetically sorted. Shawn