From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7FEC43381 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BEB218A5 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:16:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551320167; bh=1wUhbJN+Gop84TwnGzWWetTBDUMQxJV5H28RQ12PQHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=V0oCt6gdwNQ/MmlaF0HzDvs20UgbwllM/6bkFG5PZQvNwXuM3X4klIhiuqMNBBNNr hTD1WUZRvYV4VkeCLmfyz1PaM8SIy+Q1U/ZG9azAO8Q5sA/4X64HlgLpC27SrCYDqV a64N9Vciil0eAITcWHUPqHnUnJZPHEj0oujSuaPw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730254AbfB1CQG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:16:06 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41766 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730240AbfB1CQG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 21:16:06 -0500 Received: from dragon (unknown [139.162.86.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 378EC218A2; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:16:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551320166; bh=1wUhbJN+Gop84TwnGzWWetTBDUMQxJV5H28RQ12PQHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FFyqE2ehnRpnr9O3sY3yqvy5sj10MyMJ6uh6JFqzQJ2hAP8ra8JFNTdXyiGquC2iJ 5FJKMdOHEksoAqZbPLHSqIW2Sl5WYjQqeJSKrdlUJ6MIq68HIpw9J95wTRHXcZr0hO QSoaziTsicnAZdYrw+6YHHlBLEm/2CuPluUacODw= Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:15:12 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Fabio Estevam , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Abel Vesa , Bai Ping , Carlo Caione , Lucas Stach Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx8mq: Add support for the CLKO1 clock Message-ID: <20190228021509.GA26041@dragon> References: <20190131002056.12024-1-festevam@gmail.com> <155078140414.77512.3157214123340597508@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <155078140414.77512.3157214123340597508@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:36:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Fabio Estevam (2019-01-30 16:20:56) > > Add the entry for the CLKO1 clock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > > --- > > Applied to clk-next but I had to fix the whole DT binding number because > I don't know what this patch is based on. In fact, please get everyone > involved at NXP and whoever else is working on i.MX clk drivers to > coordinate somehow. I just spent 20 minutes working through the set of > imx patches in my inbox and I see approximately 6 different authors all > sending out a few clks at a time for the same drivers with zero > information about what the patches are based on or what order they're > supposed to be applied in. > > If someone wants to collect all the patches and indicate on the list > they've picked them up and will be sending them as a pull request that's > fine. I will help collect the i.MX platform clock patches and send you as pull request. Shawn