linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, aford173@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: ti: re-work divider clock support
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:57:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028135716.GZ5610@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13533ed2-1a91-2255-5f69-a28e81fba0aa@ti.com>

* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> [191028 11:37]:
> On 28/10/2019 12:23, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > On 28/10/2019 11:59, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Tero Kristo (2019-10-24 01:03:20)
> > > > On 02/10/2019 15:06, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The existing divider clock support appears to have an inherent bug
> > > > > because of the bit field width implementation and limitation of divider
> > > > > values based on this. The limitation by bit field only is not enough,
> > > > > as we can have divider settings which accept only certain range of
> > > > > dividers within the full range of the bit-field.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Because of this, the divider clock is re-implemented to use
> > > > > min,max,mask
> > > > > values instead of just the bit-field.
> > > > 
> > > > Queued this up for 5.4 fixes, thanks.
> > > 
> > > Is this a regression in 5.4-rc series? Please only send fixes for code
> > > that is broken by code that went into the merge window, or is super
> > > annoying and broken but we somehow didn't notice. If not, just let it
> > > sit in -next until the next merge window and it may still be backported
> > > to stable trees anyway.
> > 
> > Tony/Tomi, how much do you care which one this hits into?
> 
> Probably no hurry with this one, as the DSS side patch is enough to avoid
> the bad divider.

OK good to hear. Yes I too think we can wait for the clock divider
changes to trickle down to next. While they are regression fixes,
this has clearly been broken for many years.

However, the following patch should be merged during -rc as
without it sometimes devices can fail:

clk: ti: clkctrl: Fix failed to enable error with double udelay timeout:

Regards,

Tony

      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-28 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 12:06 [PATCH 0/4] clk: ti: re-work divider clock support Tero Kristo
2019-10-02 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: ti: divider: cleanup _register_divider and ti_clk_get_div_table Tero Kristo
2019-10-02 12:41   ` Adam Ford
2019-10-02 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: ti: divider: cleanup ti_clk_parse_divider_data API Tero Kristo
2019-10-02 12:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: ti: divider: convert to use min,max,mask instead of width Tero Kristo
2019-10-02 12:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: omap3: fix DPLL4 M4 divider max value Tero Kristo
2019-10-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 0/4] clk: ti: re-work divider clock support Tero Kristo
2019-10-24 13:40   ` Tony Lindgren
2019-10-28  9:59   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-10-28 10:23     ` Tero Kristo
2019-10-28 11:36       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2019-10-28 13:57         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191028135716.GZ5610@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).