From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8996C43603 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7542082E for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 18:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gerhold.net header.i=@gerhold.net header.b="k3zgNOVd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726699AbfLRS4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:56:43 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.21]:20093 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726698AbfLRS4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:56:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1576695401; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=gerhold.net; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=RHrceRHBhza4YVXmCAi7LfS8ePHybs5o1mTm91RAdCw=; b=k3zgNOVdav1wsgQY5KG6E/620q/nFNyk9DhbJc2csQDO3J8U+GlFzzT1Rznoil7gOf EmhfHtYgQ66LLw4Ccxi3F1WSZchZ2atUy/DltEYjNeCj8mITMboqEYeHkymbsXPWw43r ZL0BgmxOJbz0i0JbWc4k4/YQ9XYkHvZY/x8xm8LR+bi8pV+qKCh/hWozQ3EQffvmkNxc 8zrqwTu43ekXtreTOBxZoy//fPDtCr9Gt4iiBenG07/ValkcbxjZTWCrMgMvCAYU0z5F ifOa64BbKQ7Ig8f/Cq4pUCAEY/YqTLJw42SlPsJfU61hxIR0SH1B8XS68A7gct9s3GsM pJIQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P3gBZUipdd93FF5ZZvYFPugejmSTVR2nRPhVOQ/OcYgojyw4j34+u266HpF+ORJDY77yYxJueg==" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from gerhold.net by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.0.7 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id 9046ccvBIIocA4H (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:50:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 19:50:30 +0100 From: Stephan Gerhold To: Linus Walleij Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ux500: Fix up the SGA clock for some variants Message-ID: <20191218185030.GA60941@gerhold.net> References: <20191217210504.27888-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191217210504.27888-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Some of the special PRCMU firmware variants were not > properly detected in the Ux500 clock driver, resulting > in the wrong clock for the SGA. > > Cc: Ulf Hansson > Cc: Stephan Gerhold > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Reviewed-by: Stephan Gerhold > --- > drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c > index 72ed97c6662a..0aedd42fad52 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c > @@ -99,8 +99,10 @@ static void u8500_clk_init(struct device_node *np) > if (fw_version != NULL) { > switch (fw_version->project) { > case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8500_C2: > + case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8500_MBL: > case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8520: > case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8420: > + case PRCMU_FW_PROJECT_U8420_SYSCLK: > sgaclk_parent = "soc0_pll"; > break; > default: > -- > 2.21.0 >