linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
	Tim Gover <tim.gover@raspberrypi.com>,
	Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] dt-bindings: clock: Add a binding for the RPi Firmware clocks
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 18:23:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200530162343.6a26bfojrmnkimh3@gilmour> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159078703613.69627.13627047580756230984@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 445 bytes --]

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for your review :)

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:17:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +      "#clock-cells":
> > +        const: 1
> > +        description: >
> 
> Just curious if this is the same as the | syntax? I haven't seen this
> used before.

It differs on how it keeps the formatting of text below. | will keep the
formatting as is, > will leave the formatting to whatever is going to use it.

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-30 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-27 15:44 [PATCH v3 00/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Add support for BCM2711 firmware clocks Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/25] dt-bindings: clock: Add a binding for the RPi Firmware clocks Maxime Ripard
2020-05-29 18:14   ` Rob Herring
2020-05-29 21:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-05-30 16:23     ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Allow the driver to be probed by DT Maxime Ripard
2020-05-29 21:17   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-04 17:52   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Statically init clk_init_data Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Use clk_hw_register for pllb_arm Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Remove global pllb_arm clock pointer Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Make sure pllb_arm is removed Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Remove pllb_arm_lookup global pointer Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Switch to clk_hw_register_clkdev Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Make sure the clkdev lookup is removed Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Create a data structure for the clocks Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 14/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Add clock id to data Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 15/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Pass the clocks data to the firmware function Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 16/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Rename is_prepared function Maxime Ripard
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 17/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Split pllb clock hooks Maxime Ripard
2020-06-05 10:34   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 18/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Make the PLLB registration function return a clk_hw Maxime Ripard
2020-06-05 10:38   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 19/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Add DT provider for the clocks Maxime Ripard
2020-06-05 10:42   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 21/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Discover the firmware clocks Maxime Ripard
2020-06-05 12:45   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200530162343.6a26bfojrmnkimh3@gilmour \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.gover@raspberrypi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).