Linux-Clk Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
To: "lee.jones@linaro.org" <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-leds@vger.kernel.org" <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dmurphy@ti.com" <dmurphy@ti.com>,
	"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mazziesaccount@gmail.com" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	"a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com" <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
	"bgolaszewski@baylibre.com" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sboyd@kernel.org" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"pavel@ucw.cz" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/15] mfd: bd71828: Support ROHM BD71828 PMIC - core
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:20:46 +0000
Message-ID: <2353dd472559b3a398ca090356854bf795cece6d.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111105758.GF3218@dell>

Hello Lee,

Thanks for the review!

I was slightly worried I really managed to piss you off last time :)
Glad to see I didn't burn all the bridges (yet) ;)

On Mon, 2019-11-11 at 10:57 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2019, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > BD71828GW is a single-chip power management IC for battery-powered
> > portable
> > devices. The IC integrates 7 buck converters, 7 LDOs, and a 1500 mA
> > single-cell linear charger. Also included is a Coulomb counter, a
> > real-time
> > clock (RTC), 3 GPO/regulator control pins, HALL input and a 32.768
> > kHz
> > clock gate.
> > 
> > Add MFD core driver providing interrupt controller facilities and
> > i2c
> > access to sub device drivers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > No changes compared to v2
> > 
> >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig              |  15 ++
> >  drivers/mfd/Makefile             |   2 +-
> >  drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c       | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h | 425
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h |   1 +
> >  5 files changed, 764 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h
> 
> /me wonders why this is still an RFC after 3 revisions?

Because of the regulator part. I've had no comments for it - but I
don't think it should be applied as is in this series. I was kind of
hoping someone more experienced could have pointed me that what I have
tried to achieve here is already handled as <something I am missing
now>.

I don't think we should add sysfs control IF for disabling regulators
(I will drop that completely from first non RFC patch - but I hoped I
might get some friendly pokes/pushes to right direction). Nor am I
happy on how the run-state transitions which impact many regulators are
now handled via single regulator reference - but I can't think of
better approach just now. I hoped I am just missing something which is
obvious to more experienced regulator guys.

If I won't get comments to regulators I'll just drop the sysfs
interfaces (and possibly whole run-level control) and send series
without the RFC then. But I am still cautiously hopeful that Mark has
just a extraordinarily busy moment and will give me some feedback
before I finish v4 :)

> > +unsigned int bit0_offsets[] = {11};		/* RTC IRQ
> > register */
> > +unsigned int bit1_offsets[] = {10};		/* TEMP IRQ
> > register */
> > +unsigned int bit2_offsets[] = {6, 7, 8, 9};	/* BAT MON IRQ
> > registers */
> > +unsigned int bit3_offsets[] = {5};		/* BAT IRQ register */
> > +unsigned int bit4_offsets[] = {4};		/* CHG IRQ register */
> > +unsigned int bit5_offsets[] = {3};		/* VSYS IRQ register */
> > +unsigned int bit6_offsets[] = {1, 2};		/* DCIN IRQ
> > registers */
> 
> Something actually wrong with the tabbing here, or is this a
> Git/patch/mailer anomaly?

I'll check this - I need to staticize these anyways.

> > 
> > +static const struct of_device_id bd71828_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "rohm,bd71828", },
> > +	{ },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bd71828_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver bd71828_drv = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = "rohm-bd71828",
> > +		.of_match_table = bd71828_of_match,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe = &bd71828_i2c_probe,
> 
> If 'id' isn't used, perhaps you should be using probe2?

probe2? Sounds like I need to do my homework once again :) Thanks for
the pointer.

Rest of the comments were pretty obvious - thanks. I'll fix these for
v4.

Br,
	Matti 


  reply index

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-01 11:28 [RFC PATCH v3 00/15] Support ROHM BD71828 PMIC Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/15] mfd: bd71828: Support ROHM BD71828 PMIC - core Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-11 10:57   ` Lee Jones
2019-11-11 11:20     ` Vaittinen, Matti [this message]
2019-11-01 11:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/15] dt-bindings: mfd: Document ROHM BD71828 bindings Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-05 20:43   ` Rob Herring
2019-11-06 12:55     ` SPAM (R/EU IT) // " Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-01 11:31 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/15] dt-bindings: regulator: Document ROHM BD71282 regulator bindings Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-05 20:52   ` Rob Herring
2019-11-07  6:50     ` SPAM (R/EU IT) // " Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-01 11:32 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/15] dt-bindings: leds: ROHM BD71282 PMIC LED driver Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-05 19:14   ` Dan Murphy
2019-11-05 20:59     ` Rob Herring
2019-11-06 13:05     ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-05 20:57   ` Rob Herring
2019-11-01 11:33 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/15] mfd: input: bd71828: Add power-key support Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-11 10:59   ` Lee Jones
2019-11-11 11:07     ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-01 11:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/15] clk: bd718x7: Support ROHM BD71828 clk block Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/15] clk: bd718x7: simplify header dependencies Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/15] regulator: bd718x7: Split driver to common and bd718x7 specific parts Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:42 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/15] regulator: bd71828: Basic support for ROHM bd71828 PMIC regulators Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/15] regulator: bd71828: Add GPIO based run-level control for regulators Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-03 22:27   ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-04  7:05     ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-05 13:24       ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-05 14:07         ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-01 11:44 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/15] regulator: bd71828: enhanced run-level support Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/15] regulator: bd71828: Support in-kernel APIs to change run-level Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/15] rtc: bd70528 add BD71828 support Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:49 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/15] gpio: Add definition for GPIO direction Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-03 22:30   ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-04  6:57     ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-04 15:48     ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-05 15:05       ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-06  6:51         ` Vaittinen, Matti
2019-11-01 11:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/15] gpio: bd71828: Initial support for ROHM BD71828 PMIC GPIOs Matti Vaittinen
2019-11-01 11:53 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/15] Support ROHM BD71828 PMIC Vaittinen, Matti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2353dd472559b3a398ca090356854bf795cece6d.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --to=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Clk Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/0 linux-clk/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-clk linux-clk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk \
		linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-clk

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-clk


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git