From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01911C43381 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F91218D3 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="J8/ZCUP7"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="mpWkjbK6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728093AbfCUOur (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:50:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:44808 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728088AbfCUOur (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 10:50:47 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B56D6087F; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:50:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1553179846; bh=yowy9rN/QCpAdY30SxzxUpQ5gl5ONtmBlVm1TDftSGI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=J8/ZCUP7xKAJ064sKYnt97X7vkzPU0wzgOqbFtS3b5gO3aghRB6v+PpmR8WvE6rQs jGLAD6dxWUn3hFC68NnVN2KaDsfQZuQ19wmigbnsYsKeU/fo38IzO5YgtfNB7X6gVX SHCNZ60BuJYIYvxVTMQM868w95bjm6VjzFwFwUXs= Received: from [10.226.58.28] (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhugo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 373926141B; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:50:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1553179845; bh=yowy9rN/QCpAdY30SxzxUpQ5gl5ONtmBlVm1TDftSGI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mpWkjbK62ivjxAmJe8byst9xb3lPiuBVN/9KG4fmHYN+7Cln40INe+p3MPN98HHZ+ kLmwAKrQPVOeYZoMb3nj6Q5vnl1Qh3NKkE7Vmpwq8Cw4J7D0oUqHr2R+5+YCKWNYBu 9grUaGB5k8OFzq0UMMBD0IlUfrWWyb8yWj5oJdK8= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 373926141B Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jhugo@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clk: Probe defer clk_get() on orphans To: Stephen Boyd , mturquette@baylibre.com Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, georgi.djakov@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1549911467-2465-1-git-send-email-jhugo@codeaurora.org> <873279a6-0755-2094-ec99-d9e5f6c963dd@codeaurora.org> <155191438574.20095.6161802248500300707@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Jeffrey Hugo Message-ID: <29112c43-790e-e7e4-9e4b-9eda8f5bdb78@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:50:43 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <155191438574.20095.6161802248500300707@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On 3/6/2019 4:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-03-06 13:48:13) >> Ping? >> >> Stephen, I know as this depends on your clock parent handling series >> (happens to apply just fine to v2), its not going to be accepted until >> that gets sorted out, but do you have any thoughts on if this seems like >> an appropriate thing to do, or if you'd like to see a different solution? > > Please don't ping during the merge window. I'll probably look at this > patch next week. > Sorry about pinging during the merge window. At the time, I just realized the patch has been on list for several weeks with no response, but hadn't connected the dots that it happened to be the merge window at that particular moment. Any update on when you think you might get around to having a look at this? -- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.