From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E58C282C2 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929DA20844 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="J5GEJsPP"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="g6wxxWmU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726734AbfBFSbn (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:31:43 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:60286 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726266AbfBFSbm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:31:42 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABFC4608CE; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:31:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1549477901; bh=YlngkEcrubiWf9pZRC9IG949L1KZB0gWKk+KzEWvo0E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=J5GEJsPPxltNV7TvXemcdmfACth1ErwF0J5hSUIHH/4gGAnIVXeaTXzVKpAn4/sfh cPvCDw2zyJFkiy2E2b/HfCQdCIbhHDTsrNoSvyBPVOUIcQ8z4OzWvUa7kMeIegTK+i PBd6VTHaSN8+5BNMx+Ac/A7krSsyj2B8U0dVEJqY= Received: from x230.qca.qualcomm.com (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6316022B; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:31:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1549477900; bh=YlngkEcrubiWf9pZRC9IG949L1KZB0gWKk+KzEWvo0E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=g6wxxWmU8r9BTtfCn/xNW7kozhVfkcVwLWxOnV4n6pOl/GPtGmqmjvLSho5Z2i12t j1REG1veT03YyxuEdk8sSyKrzJP7rgs0qnpXdPXSntPhiUOWKC//IumUl8wHn5S/mN gtSrRlu7iuVMO5rFMV4m3NEKyTcwsNPTev3IJcZ0= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org AE6316022B Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: mazziesaccount@gmail.com, Guenter Roeck , heikki.haikola@fi.rohmeurope.com, mikko.mutanen@fi.rohmeurope.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sre@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, wim@linux-watchdog.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] support ROHM BD70528 PMIC References: Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 20:31:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Matti Vaittinen's message of "Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:35:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87o97ovke3.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Matti Vaittinen writes: > Patch series introducing support for ROHM BD70528 PMIC > > Please note that patch 1 breaks compilation without patches 2 and 3 > Knowing the bd718x7 driver is already in upstream, it might be good > if this change went through single tree, right? That would break bisect, please avoid that. So after applying patches from a patchset one by one the compilation should always succeed. -- Kalle Valo