linux-clk.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Anson Huang <anson.huang@nxp.com>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>,
	Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@nxp.com>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: Align imx sc clock msg structs to 4
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:52:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB42111CF54405CD3492248AF580F90@AM0PR04MB4211.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158264951569.54955.16797064769391310232@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>

> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 12:52 AM 
> Quoting Leonard Crestez (2020-02-20 08:29:32)
> > The imx SC api strongly assumes that messages are composed out of
> > 4-bytes words but some of our message structs have odd sizeofs.
> >
> > This produces many oopses with CONFIG_KASAN=y.
> >
> > Fix by marking with __aligned(4).
> >
> > Fixes: fe37b4820417 ("clk: imx: add scu clock common part")
> > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c
> > index fbef740704d0..3c5c42d8833e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-scu.c
> > @@ -41,16 +41,16 @@ struct clk_scu {
> >  struct imx_sc_msg_req_set_clock_rate {
> >         struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> >         __le32 rate;
> >         __le16 resource;
> >         u8 clk;
> > -} __packed;
> > +} __packed __aligned(4);
> 
> Sorry, this still doesn't make sense to me. Having __aligned(4) means that the
> struct is placed on the stack at some alignment, great, but it still has __packed so
> the sizeof this struct is some odd number like 11

> If this struct is the last element on the stack it will end at some unaligned address
> and the mailbox code will read a few bytes beyond the end of the stack.

Hi Leonard,

Can you construct this case to see if we can reproduce the issue as pointed by Stephen?

Regards
Aisheng

> 
> I see that the calling code puts 3 as the 'size' for this struct in clk_scu_set_rate().
> 
> 	hdr->size = 3;
> 
> That seems to say that the struct is 3 words long, or 12 bytes. Then we call
> imx_scu_call_rpc(), passing the pointer to this struct on the stack and that
> eventually gets into imx_scu_ipc_write() calling
> mbox_send_message() with u32 pointers.
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < hdr->size; i++) {
> 		sc_chan = &sc_ipc->chans[i % 4];
> 		ret = mbox_send_message(sc_chan->ch, &data[i]);
> 
> So we've taken the 11 byte struct (data in this case) and casted it to a
> u32 array with 3 elements, which is bad. This is what kasan is warning about.
> Adding aligned sometimes fixes it because the compiler will place the next stack
> variable at the naturally aligned location and thus we get the one byte padding
> but I don't see how that works when it's the last stack element. The stack will
> end at some unaligned address.
> 
> The better solution would be to drop __aligned(4) and make a union of the
> struct with whatever size number of words the message is or do a copy of the
> struct into a u32 array that is passed to imx_scu_call_rpc().
> 
> For example:
> 
> 	struct imx_sc_msg_req_set_clock_rate {
> 		union {
> 			struct packed_message {
> 				struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> 				__le32 rate;
> 				__le16 resource;
> 				u8 clk;
> 			} __packed;
> 			u32 data[3];
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> If the union approach was used then each time imx_scu_call_rpc() is called we
> can simply pass the 'data' member and make the second argument 'msg'
> strongly typed to be a u32 pointer. kasan should be happy too.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-16  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 16:29 [PATCH v2 0/8] firmware: imx: Align imx SC msg structs to 4 Leonard Crestez
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: Align imx sc clock " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-24  7:22   ` Shawn Guo
2020-03-16  0:25     ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-25 16:51   ` Stephen Boyd
2020-02-25 19:52     ` Leonard Crestez
     [not found]       ` <158276809953.177367.6095692240077023796@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
2020-03-17 19:25         ` Leonard Crestez
2020-03-17 19:54           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-03-16  8:52     ` Aisheng Dong [this message]
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] clk: imx: Align imx sc clock parent " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-24  7:23   ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] firmware: imx: misc: Align imx sc " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-24  7:28   ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] firmware: imx: scu-pd: " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-24  7:28   ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] firmware: imx: Align imx_sc_msg_req_cpu_start " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-24  7:28   ` Shawn Guo
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] pinctrl: imx: scu: Align imx sc msg structs " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-21 15:34   ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rtc: imx-sc: " Leonard Crestez
2020-03-03 11:02   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-02-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] soc: imx-scu: " Leonard Crestez
2020-02-24  7:30   ` Shawn Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR04MB42111CF54405CD3492248AF580F90@AM0PR04MB4211.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=anson.huang@nxp.com \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=franck.lenormand@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).