From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6A0C433E3 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85614206F4 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:05:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595534701; bh=Sn6HoDY8PicNwWAOK0JVC4PUBrZWa9HKEhiZGKOtMwY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=g66xePXWedzmpItwfFNTKHHiPddd6iVUoA8EGZ5+KLQX3Hzb6GLwFLspzYgtqrGr3 F3Bp7tt/ZcQLQPxIOV6yh1HaZqudDxlRwnGWaNJd8PDF9nRuww7oJBakRNgwFlhtth JsDTIMXXaOgHgx8f59KtLskVyrN4ARYxqEgfd0RA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726689AbgGWUFB (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:05:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59204 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725894AbgGWUFA (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:05:00 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com (mail-oi1-f174.google.com [209.85.167.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 381B520714; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:05:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595534700; bh=Sn6HoDY8PicNwWAOK0JVC4PUBrZWa9HKEhiZGKOtMwY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=tdpfEy9/TuIlS1miYHevyg9cFfjUVIr0SMqJq3V1o5s1ty72i5pH3W7BATMwjL2qR Ib52wGUhvGVSBQFyd2dBJOzs2aeT6bplY7LIfFOL7tiTfABk9SHywBqtfi0BlxwOPj XySoNw2DeQ1PxhTshuc5XVW3TUx/R8VxVQXiWNyE= Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id k6so6088928oij.11; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:05:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334jPcNVV4k0CzZEuB1YYAuP2lqAN9VQCKbJc80njn4b2CV+l/n 65TyONzxVip/ujEurzsC5Y3XWidyjaRdCEF18g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWExdLUboZbuKY45/47MrATnklTefnT1gGZt8ZndUCAi2L0lI0a9kQ51jX4lZbOJsqfWsizPieoSOvViwRY8M= X-Received: by 2002:aca:bb82:: with SMTP id l124mr5467888oif.106.1595534699564; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 13:04:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200626115433.125735-1-maxime@cerno.tech> <20200723154421.yzecsy5qctqbgbxc@gilmour.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200723154421.yzecsy5qctqbgbxc@gilmour.lan> From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:04:48 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: bcm: Add a select to the RPI Firmware binding To: Maxime Ripard , Stephen Boyd Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Mike Turquette , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" , linux-clk , Mark Rutland , Frank Rowand , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:44 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Stephen, Mike, > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The RaspberryPi firmware binding uses two compatible, include simple-bus. > > The select statement generated by default will thus select any node that > > has simple-bus, not all of them being the raspberrypi firmware node. > > > > This results in warnings being wrongfully reported. Let's add a custom > > select statement to fix that. > > > > Fixes: 5bc0b9be8544 ("dt-bindings: arm: bcm: Convert BCM2835 firmware binding to YAML") > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > > > --- > > > > The original binding has been merged through the clock tree, so it should > > be merged there. > > Could you apply that patch to clk-next? While I said 'simple-mfd' would be more appropriate, that's a separate issue I guess, so: Acked-by: Rob Herring BTW, qcom,msm8996-apcc.yaml is also breaking linux-next.