From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E1CC4360C for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AE0208C3 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="I/e/eGnZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725909AbfJJPcv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:32:51 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:58592 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725901AbfJJPcu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:32:50 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9AFWkJq098313; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1570721566; bh=RUWS7sx9oE5/v76QHiiPQhgGba9CbGW84cJd7KySne4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=I/e/eGnZFBmizck/Nz50IcrfGKcG4zQUh2f/BvgFuvGohdTHsTBCsUPWhKLRy0bBd 8Y97+SSjzv9Qu5k3XkZThyCBtHsLHn49tu0unT2AS4YdgZLn0rJ8hAVZQLA8mMAlI4 kxX/fD6IIKGsObOaU7mb4W1HZDZdtf7I0zO+mlEc= Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (dfle112.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.33]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9AFWkhJ127205 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:46 -0500 Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:42 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:42 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9AFWiNY083856; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/10] clk: ti: remoteproc / iommu support patches To: Tony Lindgren CC: , , , , References: <20190912132613.28093-1-t-kristo@ti.com> <20191010143521.GX5610@atomide.com> From: Tero Kristo Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:32:43 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191010143521.GX5610@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On 10/10/2019 17:35, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tero Kristo [191010 08:34]: >> On 12/09/2019 16:26, Tero Kristo wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> V3 of this series sort of reverted back to pretty much V1 which expects >>> strict sequencing of events from the bus driver. This one doesn't have >>> any dependency towards the reset driver either, and the controversial >>> reset handling APIs have been removed. >>> >>> -Tero >> >> Stephen, any comments on this one or shall I just craft a pull-request for >> this and rest of the TI clock driver changes towards 5.5? There seems to be >> a pile of them coming this time over... > > Sounds like we need an immutable branch for the clkctrl related > changes against v5.4-rc1 that I can also merge into omap-for-v5.5/prm > branch in addition to the immutable prm reset driver branch. > > Otherwise I can't apply any of the consumer device related dts > changes into that branch AFAIK. Well, the sgx patch you can probably merge, as it will fail silently and only cause issues if you actually try to enable the device. However, yes I agree, we should probably setup an immutable branch here. -Tero -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki