linux-coco.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	tony.luck@intel.com, npmccallum@redhat.com,
	brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 10/40] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:16:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c6b6fc4-05b2-8d18-2eb8-1bd1a965c632@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210707183616.5620-11-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

Oh, here's the THP code.  The subject just changed.

On 7/7/21 11:35 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> When SEV-SNP is enabled globally, a write from the host goes through the
> RMP check. When the host writes to pages, hardware checks the following
> conditions at the end of page walk:
> 
> 1. Assigned bit in the RMP table is zero (i.e page is shared).
> 2. If the page table entry that gives the sPA indicates that the target
>    page size is a large page, then all RMP entries for the 4KB
>    constituting pages of the target must have the assigned bit 0.
> 3. Immutable bit in the RMP table is not zero.
> 
> The hardware will raise page fault if one of the above conditions is not
> met. Try resolving the fault instead of taking fault again and again. If
> the host attempts to write to the guest private memory then send the
> SIGBUG signal to kill the process. If the page level between the host and

"SIGBUG"?

> RMP entry does not match, then split the address to keep the RMP and host
> page levels in sync.


> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h  |  6 +++-
>  mm/memory.c         | 13 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 195149eae9b6..cdf48019c1a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -1281,6 +1281,58 @@ do_kern_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long hw_error_code,
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_kern_addr_fault);
>  
> +#define RMP_FAULT_RETRY		0
> +#define RMP_FAULT_KILL		1
> +#define RMP_FAULT_PAGE_SPLIT	2
> +
> +static inline size_t pages_per_hpage(int level)
> +{
> +	return page_level_size(level) / PAGE_SIZE;
> +}
> +
> +static int handle_user_rmp_page_fault(unsigned long hw_error_code, unsigned long address)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pfn, mask;
> +	int rmp_level, level;
> +	struct rmpentry *e;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP)))
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;

Shouldn't this be a WARN_ON_ONCE()?  How can we get RMP faults without
SEV-SNP?

> +	/* Get the native page level */
> +	pte = lookup_address_in_mm(current->mm, address, &level);
> +	if (unlikely(!pte))
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;

What would this mean?  There was an RMP fault on a non-present page?
How could that happen?  What if there was a race between an unmapping
event and the RMP fault delivery?

> +	pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
> +	if (level > PG_LEVEL_4K) {
> +		mask = pages_per_hpage(level) - pages_per_hpage(level - 1);
> +		pfn |= (address >> PAGE_SHIFT) & mask;
> +	}

This looks inherently racy.  What happens if there are two parallel RMP
faults on the same 2M page.  One of them splits the page tables, the
other gets a fault for an already-split page table.

Is that handled here somehow?

> +	/* Get the page level from the RMP entry. */
> +	e = snp_lookup_page_in_rmptable(pfn_to_page(pfn), &rmp_level);
> +	if (!e)
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;

The snp_lookup_page_in_rmptable() failure cases looks WARN-worthly.
Either you're doing a lookup for something not *IN* the RMP table, or
you don't support SEV-SNP, in which case you shouldn't be in this code
in the first place.

> +	/*
> +	 * Check if the RMP violation is due to the guest private page access.
> +	 * We can not resolve this RMP fault, ask to kill the guest.
> +	 */
> +	if (rmpentry_assigned(e))
> +		return RMP_FAULT_KILL;

No "We's", please.  Speak in imperative voice.

> +	/*
> +	 * The backing page level is higher than the RMP page level, request
> +	 * to split the page.
> +	 */
> +	if (level > rmp_level)
> +		return RMP_FAULT_PAGE_SPLIT;

This can theoretically trigger on a hugetlbfs page.  Right?

I thought I asked about this before... more below...

> +	return RMP_FAULT_RETRY;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Handle faults in the user portion of the address space.  Nothing in here
>   * should check X86_PF_USER without a specific justification: for almost
> @@ -1298,6 +1350,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	struct task_struct *tsk;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
>  	vm_fault_t fault;
> +	int ret;
>  	unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT;
>  
>  	tsk = current;
> @@ -1378,6 +1431,22 @@ void 
(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR)
>  		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If its an RMP violation, try resolving it.
> +	 */
> +	if (error_code & X86_PF_RMP) {
> +		ret = handle_user_rmp_page_fault(error_code, address);
> +		if (ret == RMP_FAULT_PAGE_SPLIT) {
> +			flags |= FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT;
> +		} else if (ret == RMP_FAULT_KILL) {
> +			fault |= VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> +			do_sigbus(regs, error_code, address, fault);
> +			return;
> +		} else {
> +			return;
> +		}
> +	}

Why not just have handle_user_rmp_page_fault() return a VM_FAULT_* code
directly?

I also suspect you can just set VM_FAULT_SIGBUS and let the do_sigbus()
call later on in the function do its work.

>  	 * Faults in the vsyscall page might need emulation.  The
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 322ec61d0da7..211dfe5d3b1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE: The fault is not for current task/mm.
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION: The fault was during an instruction fetch.
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE: The fault can be interrupted by non-fatal signals.
> + * @FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT: The fault was due page size mismatch, split the
> + *  region to smaller page size and retry.
>   *
>   * About @FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and @FAULT_FLAG_TRIED: we can specify
>   * whether we would allow page faults to retry by specifying these two
> @@ -481,6 +483,7 @@ enum fault_flag {
>  	FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE =		1 << 7,
>  	FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION =	1 << 8,
>  	FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE =	1 << 9,
> +	FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT =		1 << 10,
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -520,7 +523,8 @@ static inline bool fault_flag_allow_retry_first(enum fault_flag flags)
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_USER,		"USER" }, \
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,		"REMOTE" }, \
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION,	"INSTRUCTION" }, \
> -	{ FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE,	"INTERRUPTIBLE" }
> +	{ FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE,	"INTERRUPTIBLE" }, \
> +	{ FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT,	"PAGESPLIT" }
>  
>  /*
>   * vm_fault is filled by the pagefault handler and passed to the vma's
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 730daa00952b..aef261d94e33 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4407,6 +4407,15 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int handle_split_page_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +{
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT))
> +		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
> +
> +	__split_huge_pmd(vmf->vma, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, false, NULL);
> +	return 0;
> +}

What will this do when you hand it a hugetlbfs page?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-08 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 176+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-07 18:35 [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 00/40] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 01/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle AP reset MSR protocol Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 20:17   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15  7:39     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-15 13:42     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-15 15:45       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 17:05         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 02/40] KVM: SVM: Provide the Hypervisor Feature support VMGEXIT Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 20:37   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-14 21:00     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 03/40] x86/cpufeatures: Add SEV-SNP CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 04/40] x86/sev: Add the host SEV-SNP initialization support Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 21:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-14 22:02     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 22:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-14 22:11         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 05/40] x86/sev: Add RMP entry lookup helpers Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15 18:37   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 19:28     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 17:22       ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 22:06         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 23:10           ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 06/40] x86/sev: Add helper functions for RMPUPDATE and PSMASH instruction Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 18:44   ` Peter Gonda
2021-07-12 19:00     ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-15 18:56       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 19:08         ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-15 19:18           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 07/40] x86/sev: Split the physmap when adding the page in RMP table Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 22:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 17:05     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15 17:51       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 18:14         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15 18:39           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 19:38             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15 22:01               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 22:11                 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-30 11:31               ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-30 16:10                 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 08/40] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-15 19:16     ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 09/40] x86/fault: Add support to dump RMP entry on fault Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 19:21   ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-08 15:02     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-08 15:30       ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-08 16:48         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-08 16:58           ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-08 17:11             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-08 17:15               ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 10/40] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address Brijesh Singh
2021-07-08 16:16   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-07-12 15:43     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 16:00       ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-12 16:11         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 16:15           ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-12 16:24             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 16:29               ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-12 16:49                 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-15 21:53                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-30 16:00   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-30 16:31     ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 11/40] crypto:ccp: Define the SEV-SNP commands Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 12/40] crypto: ccp: Add support to initialize the AMD-SP for SEV-SNP Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 13/40] crypto: ccp: Shutdown SNP firmware on kexec Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 14/40] crypto:ccp: Provide APIs to issue SEV-SNP commands Brijesh Singh
2021-07-08 18:56   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 15/40] crypto: ccp: Handle the legacy TMR allocation when SNP is enabled Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 13:22   ` Marc Orr
2021-07-14 16:45     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 18:14       ` Marc Orr
2021-07-15 23:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 12:55     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 15:35       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 15:47         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 16/40] crypto: ccp: Handle the legacy SEV command " Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 17/40] crypto: ccp: Add the SNP_PLATFORM_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 18/40] crypto: ccp: Add the SNP_{SET,GET}_EXT_CONFIG command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 19/40] crypto: ccp: provide APIs to query extended attestation report Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 20/40] KVM: SVM: Make AVIC backing, VMSA and VMCB memory allocation SNP safe Brijesh Singh
2021-07-14 13:35   ` Marc Orr
2021-07-14 16:47     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 18:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-03 14:38     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 21/40] KVM: SVM: Add initial SEV-SNP support Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 18:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 18:46     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 19:31       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 21:03         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 22/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SNP_INIT command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 19:33   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 21:25     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 20:24       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-07 18:35 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 23/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-12 18:45   ` Peter Gonda
2021-07-16 19:43   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 21:42     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 24/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 20:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 22:00     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 20:51       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 21:34         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 21:36           ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 20:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 22:16     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-17  0:46       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 12:55         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 17:18           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 18:34             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 19:03               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 19:14                 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 19:37                 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 16:40                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 18:23                     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 20:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 22:48     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 16:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 18:29         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 19:14           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 19:49             ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 20:13               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-21 17:53         ` Marc Orr
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 27/40] KVM: X86: Add kvm_x86_ops to get the max page level for the TDP Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 19:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-16 20:41     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 19:38       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 20:06         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 28/40] KVM: X86: Introduce kvm_mmu_map_tdp_page() for use by SEV Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 18:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 29/40] KVM: X86: Introduce kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk() for SEV-SNP use Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 30/40] KVM: X86: Define new RMP check related #NPF error bits Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 20:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-17  0:34     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 31/40] KVM: X86: update page-fault trace to log the 64-bit error code Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 20:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-17  0:35     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 32/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle GHCB GPA register VMGEXIT Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 20:45   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-17  0:44     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 20:04       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 33/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle MSR based Page State Change VMGEXIT Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 21:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 14:19     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 18:55       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 19:15         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-08-13 16:32         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 34/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle " Brijesh Singh
2021-07-16 21:14   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-19 14:24     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 35/40] KVM: Add arch hooks to track the host write to guest memory Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 23:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 15:15     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 36/40] KVM: X86: Export the kvm_zap_gfn_range() for the SNP use Brijesh Singh
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 37/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20  0:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 17:55     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 22:31       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 23:53         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-21 20:15           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Brijesh Singh
2021-07-19 22:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 14:37     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 16:28       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-20 18:21         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-07-20 22:09           ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 39/40] KVM: SVM: Use a VMSA physical address variable for populating VMCB Brijesh Singh
2021-07-21  0:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-21 16:26     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-07 18:36 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 40/40] KVM: SVM: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event Brijesh Singh
2021-07-21  0:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-21 17:47     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-21 19:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-20 14:44         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-07-08 15:40 ` [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 00/40] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c6b6fc4-05b2-8d18-2eb8-1bd1a965c632@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dovmurik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npmccallum@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tobin@ibm.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 10/40] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox