From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: process? [Re: Crypto Fixes for 4.19] Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:48:42 -0700 Message-ID: <06e6fac1-6011-7117-454f-af930a288d75@infradead.org> References: <20171128230929.GA17783@gondor.apana.org.au> <20171222064931.GA27068@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180105073808.GA14405@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180212031702.GA26153@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180428080517.haxgpvqrwgotakyo@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180622145403.6ltjip7che227fuo@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180829033353.agnzxra3jk2r2mzg@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180919062201.ov5o4vljvholgsed@gondor.apana.org.au> <20180919132324.GA24399@kroah.com> <20180919164019.GA7195@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Herbert Xu , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Crypto Mailing List To: Greg KH Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180919164019.GA7195@kroah.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On 9/19/18 9:40 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:10:55AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 9/19/18 6:23 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 02:22:01PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >>>> Hi Greg: >>>> >>>> This push fixes a potential boot hang in ccp and an incorrect >>>> CPU capability check in aegis/morus on x86. >>>> >>>> >>>> Please pull from >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6.git linus >>> >>> Now pulled, thanks. >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> Hi, >> Just a process question: >> >> It looks like Greg is not adding Signed-of-by: >> to mainline git commits, although the prior mainline git committer did so. >> >> Is that omission on purpose? > > s-o-b does not get added to git pulls, I "trust" the subsystem > maintainer got it correct. That's what Linus has always done in the > past, what am I doing differently here? > >> submitting-patches.rst says: >> The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the >> development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. > > Yes, but not for git pulls. > > I have not applied any patches sent in emails at this point in time, so > there's nothing that I could have even signed off on. OK, I see. > confused, no, that's me :) thanks, -- ~Randy