From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] nvme: Implement In-Band authentication
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:12:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14949004-6ef5-b8e5-f133-c50fe311a693@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3098fb2-2127-6f81-97e9-ab5de503508e@vlnb.net>
On 7/20/21 10:28 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
> On 7/18/21 3:21 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 7/17/21 9:22 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>> Implement NVMe-oF In-Band authentication. This patch adds two new
>>>> fabric options 'dhchap_key' to specify the PSK
>>>
>>> pre-shared-key.
>>>
>>> Also, we need a sysfs knob to rotate the key that will trigger
>>> re-authentication or even a simple controller(s-plural) reset, so this
>>> should go beyond just the connection string.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, re-authentication currently is not implemented. I first wanted to
>> get this patchset out such that we can settle on the userspace interface
>> (both from host and target).
>> I'll have to think on how we should handle authentication; one of the
>> really interesting cases would be when one malicious admin will _just_
>> send a 'negotiate' command to the controller. As per spec the controller
>> will be waiting for an 'authentication receive' command to send a
>> 'challenge' payload back to the host. But that will never come, so as it
>> stands currently the controller is required to abort the connection.
>> Not very nice.
>
> Yes, in this case after some reasonable timeout (I would suggest 10-15
> seconds) the controller expected to abort connection and clean up all
> allocated resources.
>
> To handle DoS possibility to make too many such "orphan" negotiations,
> hence consume all controller memory, some additional handling is needed.
> For simplicity as a first step I would suggest to have a global limit on
> number of currently being authenticated connections.
>
> [...]
>
>>>> + chap->key = nvme_auth_extract_secret(ctrl->opts->dhchap_secret,
>>>> + &chap->key_len);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(chap->key)) {
>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(chap->key);
>>>> + chap->key = NULL;
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (key_hash == 0)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + hmac_name = nvme_auth_hmac_name(key_hash);
>>>> + if (!hmac_name) {
>>>> + pr_debug("Invalid key hash id %d\n", key_hash);
>>>> + return -EKEYREJECTED;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> Why does the user influence the hmac used? isn't that is driven
>>> by the susbsystem?
>>>
>>> I don't think that the user should choose in this level.
>>>
>>
>> That is another weirdness of the spec.
>> The _secret_ will be hashed with a specific function, and that function
>> is stated in the transport representation.
>> (Cf section "DH-HMAC-CHAP Security Requirements").
>> This is _not_ the hash function used by the authentication itself, which
>> will be selected by the protocol.
>> So it's not the user here, but rather the transport specification of the
>> key which selects the hash algorithm.
>
> Yes, good catch. It looks as a minor errata material to specify that
> hash function here is implementation specific.
>
> I would suggest to just hardcode SHA512 here. Users don't have to be
> confused by this.
>
Sure, can do. My reasoning was that the target absolutely has to support
the hash functions specified in the PSK, so that will be a safe bet to
choose for the hash function in the protocol itself.
(Any other hash function _might_ not be preset on the target.)
But if the PSK does not specify a hash the target need to pick one; and
for that of course we can use SHA512.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 11:04 [RFC PATCH 00/11] nvme: In-band authentication support Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] crypto: add crypto_has_shash() Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 6:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 02/11] crypto: add crypto_has_kpp() Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 6:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 03/11] crypto/ffdhe: Finite Field DH Ephemeral Parameters Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 6:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-17 13:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 15:03 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-18 12:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 04/11] lib/base64: RFC4648-compliant base64 encoding Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 6:16 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-17 14:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 14:12 ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-17 14:20 ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 05/11] nvme: add definitions for NVMe In-Band authentication Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 6:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-17 14:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-20 20:26 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 06/11] nvme: Implement " Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 7:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-18 12:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-19 8:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-20 20:28 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-21 6:12 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2021-07-17 16:49 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-18 12:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-18 12:47 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-20 20:27 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-21 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-21 12:10 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvme-auth: augmented challenge support Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 16:49 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-18 12:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-18 12:57 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-19 9:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-20 13:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 08/11] nvmet: Parse fabrics commands on all queues Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-19 9:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 09/11] nvmet: Implement basic In-Band Authentication Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 16:49 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-18 12:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-18 12:56 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-19 8:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-19 8:51 ` Stephan Mueller
2021-07-19 9:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-19 10:19 ` Stephan Mueller
2021-07-19 11:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-19 11:52 ` Stephan Mueller
2021-07-19 12:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-20 10:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-20 10:49 ` Simo Sorce
2021-07-20 11:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-20 14:44 ` Simo Sorce
2021-07-20 14:47 ` Stephan Mueller
2021-07-23 20:02 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-18 13:26 ` Herbert Xu
2021-07-19 20:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-20 6:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 10/11] nvmet-auth: implement support for augmented challenge Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 16:49 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-18 12:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-16 11:04 ` [PATCH 11/11] nvme: add non-standard ECDH and curve25517 algorithms Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 16:50 ` Stephan Müller
2021-07-18 12:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-19 9:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-19 9:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-17 6:06 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] nvme: In-band authentication support Sagi Grimberg
2021-07-19 10:02 ` Simo Sorce
2021-07-19 11:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-20 20:26 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-21 6:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-07-21 12:10 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-23 20:02 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2021-07-24 11:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-05-18 11:22 [PATCHv12 " Hannes Reinecke
2022-05-18 11:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] nvme: Implement In-Band authentication Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14949004-6ef5-b8e5-f133-c50fe311a693@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=vst@vlnb.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).