From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: Crypto Update for 2.6.38 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:39:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20110106213928.jd36vdlpcgsgcwss-cebfxv@webmail.spamcop.net> References: <20100804140448.GA4042@gondor.apana.org.au> <20101024061625.GA23715@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110106000157.GA16089@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110106211645.GA26184@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110106213932.GA26538@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110106223042.GA27080@gondor.apana.org.au> <20110106225301.GA27358@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Crypto Mailing List To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:54071 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751694Ab1AGCja (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:39:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110106225301.GA27358@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Herbert Xu : > setsockopt(tfmfd, SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY, > "\x06\xa9\x21\x40\x36\xb8\xa1\x5b" > "\x51\x2e\x03\xd5\x34\x12\x00\x06", 16); By the way, is it a good idea to use setsockopt() this way? Some keys may be large. And if AEAD is supported, will it use setsockopt() for the unencrypted authenticated data? Maybe some variation of write() or sendto() would be more appropriate? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin