linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:35:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170111043541.GA4944@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzypqpMog8aTczWYok0MqOcMi4gGzCor6k-NdJzBoLWyQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:17:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> That said, I do think that the "don't assume stack alignment, do it by
> hand" may be the safer thing. Because who knows what the random rules
> will be on other architectures.

Sure we can ban the use of attribute aligned on stacks.  But
what about indirect uses through structures?  For example, if
someone does

struct foo {
} __attribute__ ((__aligned__(16)));

int bar(...)
{
	struct foo f;

	return baz(&f);
}

then baz will end up with an unaligned argument.  The worst part
is that it is not at all obvious to the person writing the function
bar.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-11  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-10 14:33 x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu
2017-01-10 14:39 ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-10 17:05   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-10 17:09     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-11  3:11     ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-11  3:30       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-11  4:17         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-11  4:35           ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2017-01-11  6:01             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-12  6:21               ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-12  7:40                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-12 14:02                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-12 19:51                   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-12 20:08                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-12 20:15                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-12 20:55                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-12 21:40                           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-01-13  8:38                             ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-13  1:46                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-13  3:11                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-13  3:23                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-13  4:27                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
     [not found]                                 ` <CA+55aFzRrSwGxxfZk-RUEnsz=xhcSmOwE1CenfCPBWtsS9MwDw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-13  5:07                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-13  8:43                                     ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-13  8:42                                   ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-13  8:39                           ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-13  8:36                       ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-13 13:07                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
     [not found]             ` <CA+55aFw+Z_ieo6DzTVB6_-TvQ0jj60s=T0mvXfqkBVFdKFPw_Q@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-11  8:06               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-11  8:09                 ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-11 18:20                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-12  7:05     ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-12  7:46       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-12 14:49         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-12  7:51       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-12  8:04         ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-12  8:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-12 15:03         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-12 15:06           ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-12 15:18             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-12 15:10           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-10 17:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-10 19:00   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-10 19:16     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-10 19:22       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-10 20:00         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-10 23:25           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-11  3:26             ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-11  3:26         ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-11  3:16     ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-11  3:15   ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-12  6:12   ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-12  8:01     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-12  8:06       ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170111043541.GA4944@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).