From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giovanni Cabiddu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] mm: zswap - Add crypto acomp/scomp framework support Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:12:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20170215221208.GA820@silv-gc1.ir.intel.com> References: <1487086821-5880-1-git-send-email-Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com> <1487086821-5880-2-git-send-email-Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com> <58A45E4A.8080508@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Seth Jennings , Mahipal Challa , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linux-MM , pathreya@cavium.com, vnair@cavium.com, Mahipal Challa , Vishnu Nair To: Narayana Prasad Athreya Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58A45E4A.8080508@caviumnetworks.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:27:30PM +0530, Narayana Prasad Athreya wrote: > > I assume all of these crypto_acomp_[compress|decompress] calls are > > actually synchronous, > > not asynchronous as the name suggests. Otherwise, this would blow up > > quite spectacularly > > since all the resources we use in the call get derefed/unmapped below. > > > > Could an async algorithm be implement/used that would break this assumption? > > The callback is set to NULL using acomp_request_set_callback(). This implies > synchronous mode of operation. So the underlying implementation must > complete the operation synchronously. This assumption is not correct. An asynchronous implementation, when it finishes processing a request, will call acomp_request_complete() which in turn calls the callback. If the callback is set to NULL, this function will dereference a NULL pointer. Regards, -- Giovanni -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org