From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@verimatrix.com>
Cc: "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] md/dm-crypt - reuse eboiv skcipher for IV generation
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 15:04:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809220452.GC100971@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR20MB29736FF8E67D83FEA5A52E14CAD60@MN2PR20MB2973.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 09:33:14PM +0000, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote:
> Real life designs require all kinds of trade-offs and compromises.
> If you want to make something twice as expensive, you'd better have a
> really solid reason for doing so. So yes, I do believe it is useful to
> be sceptical and question these things. But I always listen to good
> arguments, so just convince me I got it wrong *for my particular use
> case* (I'm not generally interested in the generic case).
Or rather, if you want to take shortcuts and incorrectly implement a crypto
construction, you'd better have a really solid reason for doing so.
It's on you to show that your crypto is okay, not me.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 5:50 [RFC PATCH v2] md/dm-crypt - reuse eboiv skcipher for IV generation Ard Biesheuvel
2019-08-07 7:28 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-07 13:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-08-07 13:52 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-07 15:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-08-07 16:14 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-07 16:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-08-07 20:22 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-08 8:30 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-08 9:31 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-08 12:52 ` Milan Broz
2019-08-08 13:23 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-08 17:15 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-09 9:17 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-09 17:17 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-09 20:29 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-09 20:56 ` Eric Biggers
2019-08-09 21:33 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-09 22:04 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-08-09 23:01 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-08-07 8:08 ` Milan Broz
2019-08-08 11:53 ` Milan Broz
2019-08-09 18:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190809220452.GC100971@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pvanleeuwen@verimatrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).