From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
David Safford <david.safford@ge.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes()
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:22:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004182216.GB6945@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570147177.10818.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 04:59:37PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> I think the principle of using multiple RNG sources for strong keys is
> a sound one, so could I propose a compromise: We have a tpm subsystem
> random number generator that, when asked for <n> random bytes first
> extracts <n> bytes from the TPM RNG and places it into the kernel
> entropy pool and then asks for <n> random bytes from the kernel RNG?
> That way, it will always have the entropy to satisfy the request and in
> the worst case, where the kernel has picked up no other entropy sources
> at all it will be equivalent to what we have now (single entropy
> source) but usually it will be a much better mixed entropy source.
I think we should rely the existing architecture where TPM is
contributing to the entropy pool as hwrng.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-26 17:16 [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-28 18:05 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-01 20:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-02 14:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 11:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 11:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 13:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 17:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 21:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 21:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 23:59 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-10-04 18:24 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:33 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 20:07 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 20:11 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 22:11 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-06 0:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-06 23:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 18:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-04 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 13:26 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-04 18:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 19:56 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-07 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 22:13 ` Ken Goldman
2019-10-08 23:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-08 23:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:10 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 7:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 8:09 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-14 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 8:02 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 12:11 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-14 19:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 11:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 12:34 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 16:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 19:10 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 12:52 ` Sumit Garg
2019-10-17 12:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 18:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-21 11:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 8:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-31 21:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-18 7:32 ` Janne Karhunen
2019-10-03 18:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 10:33 ` Janne Karhunen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191004182216.GB6945@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.safford@ge.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).