From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes()
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:33:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009073315.GA5884@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191008235339.GB13926@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:53:39AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:49:35AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 06:13:01PM -0400, Ken Goldman wrote:
> > > The TPM library specification states that the TPM must comply with NIST
> > > SP800-90 A.
> > >
> > > https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/membership/certification/tpm-certified-products/
> > >
> > > shows that the TPMs get third party certification, Common Criteria EAL 4+.
> > >
> > > While it's theoretically possible that an attacker could compromise
> > > both the TPM vendors and the evaluation agencies, we do have EAL 4+
> > > assurance against both 1 and 2.
> >
> > Certifications do not equal to trust.
>
> And for trusted keys the least trust solution is to do generation
> with the kernel assets and sealing with TPM. With TEE the least
> trust solution is equivalent.
>
> Are you proposing that the kernel random number generation should
> be removed? That would be my conclusion of this discussion if I
> would agree any of this (I don't).
The whole point of rng in kernel has been to use multiple entropy
sources in order to disclose the trust issue.
Even with weaker entropy than TPM RNG it is still a better choice for
*non-TPM* keys because of better trustworthiness. Using only TPM RNG is
a design flaw that has existed probably because when trusted keys were
introduced TPM was more niche than it is today.
Please remember that a trusted key is not a TPM key. The reality
distortion field is strong here it seems.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-26 17:16 [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-28 18:05 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-01 20:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-02 14:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 11:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 11:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 13:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 17:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 21:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 21:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 23:59 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:24 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:33 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 20:07 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 20:11 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 22:11 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-06 0:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-06 23:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 18:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-04 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 13:26 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-04 18:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 19:56 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-07 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 22:13 ` Ken Goldman
2019-10-08 23:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-08 23:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:10 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 7:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-10-09 7:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 8:09 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-14 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 8:02 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 12:11 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-14 19:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 11:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 12:34 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 16:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 19:10 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 12:52 ` Sumit Garg
2019-10-17 12:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 18:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-21 11:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 8:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-31 21:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-18 7:32 ` Janne Karhunen
2019-10-03 18:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 10:33 ` Janne Karhunen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191009073315.GA5884@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.safford@ge.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).