From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1039FC432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D240620707 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:37:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574397472; bh=SUQ9OFAb62GXoX/MtVCEnH4ZzSHKhWxeJQUcD9rTFj8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=idxRlh7fK/SHuIiNcJJlgSCL4ku1QKA9nuuOuGUFoRbkQBcGnQmIy5erH+CUaPLL3 84aWnYDD7uaBlkZeo8i62s7uWw78nKjuIj6LrTKWwBN3iVc+3klbyCDsrmvePxfEDo ZcG8bc6mND+4F/YUnCE2YR4NEyNBzWOBblhh3+tM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726546AbfKVEhv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:37:51 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57820 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726529AbfKVEhv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:37:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [171.61.94.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 573AB2068D; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:37:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574397471; bh=SUQ9OFAb62GXoX/MtVCEnH4ZzSHKhWxeJQUcD9rTFj8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Rz++MFrfWK+An4b+AwBuTYhLWNDxawnfeV1XKGoY1BJL4CBdVW757Al5r599uC2cX Mi5eym5FF1c8+yTGXVDulsls3nfj+r5n3ZDH/oMtPD79UJXqhYzemEX1TbpDztsmKO Rm2C57tdhmZ5HLT4ZgLTiZcnxlIMKWXcpydxWV78= Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:07:45 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] crypto: atmel - Retire dma_request_slave_channel_compat() Message-ID: <20191122043745.GK82508@vkoul-mobl> References: <20191121101602.21941-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191121101602.21941-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On 21-11-19, 12:15, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > Changes since v1: > - Rebased on next-20191121 to avoid conflict for atmel-aes > > I'm going through the kernel to crack down on dma_request_slave_channel_compat() > users. > > These drivers no longer needs it as they are only probed via DT and even if they > would probe in legacy mode, the dma_request_chan() + dma_slave_map must be used > for supporting non DT boots. Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul -- ~Vinod