Linux-Crypto Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@foundries.io>
To: "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@foundries.io>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	ricardo@foundries.io, Michael Scott <mike@foundries.io>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
	"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
	<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] hwrng: optee: fix wait use case
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:05:55 +0200
Message-ID: <20200728100555.GA2074@trex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724142305.GA24164@trex>

On 24/07/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> On 24/07/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@foundries.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> > > second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> > > while loop exits.
> > >
> > > This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second
> > > time if only partial data was retrieved on the first read.
> > >
> > > This fix also does not attempt to read if not data is requested.
> > 
> > I am not sure how this is possible, can you elaborate?
> 
> currently, if the user sets max 0, get_optee_rng_data will regardless
> issuese a call to the secure world requesting 0 bytes from the RNG
> 
> with this patch, this request is avoided.
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@foundries.io>
> > > ---
> > >  v2: tidy up the while loop to avoid reading when no data is requested
> > >
> > >  drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
> > > index 5bc4700c4dae..a99d82949981 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/optee-rng.c
> > > @@ -122,14 +122,14 @@ static int optee_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait)
> > >         if (max > MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ)
> > >                 max = MAX_ENTROPY_REQ_SZ;
> > >
> > > -       while (read == 0) {
> > > +       while (read < max) {
> > >                 rng_size = get_optee_rng_data(pvt_data, data, (max - read));
> > >
> > >                 data += rng_size;
> > >                 read += rng_size;
> > >
> > >                 if (wait && pvt_data->data_rate) {
> > > -                       if (timeout-- == 0)
> > > +                       if ((timeout-- == 0) || (read == max))
> > 
> > If read == max, would there be any sleep?
> 
> no but I see no reason why there should be a wait since we already have
> all the data that we need; the msleep is only required when we need to
> wait for the RNG to generate entropy for the number of bytes we are
> requesting. if we are requesting 0 bytes, the entropy is already
> available. at leat this is what makes sense to me.
> 
>

any further comments?

> > 
> > -Sumit
> > 
> > >                                 return read;
> > >                         msleep((1000 * (max - read)) / pvt_data->data_rate);
> > >                 } else {
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >

  reply index

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-23  8:46 [PATCHv2 1/2] hwrng: optee: handle unlimited data rates Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2020-07-23  8:46 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] hwrng: optee: fix wait use case Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
2020-07-24 13:22   ` Sumit Garg
2020-07-24 14:23     ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2020-07-28 10:05       ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries [this message]
2020-08-05 13:49       ` Sumit Garg
2020-08-05 20:38         ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2020-08-06  6:11           ` Sumit Garg
2020-08-06  6:30             ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2020-08-06  6:57               ` Sumit Garg
2020-08-06  8:14                 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2020-08-06  9:15                   ` Sumit Garg
2020-08-05 13:34   ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2020-07-24 13:24 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] hwrng: optee: handle unlimited data rates Sumit Garg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200728100555.GA2074@trex \
    --to=jorge@foundries.io \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike@foundries.io \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
    --cc=ricardo@foundries.io \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-Crypto Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/0 linux-crypto/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-crypto linux-crypto/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto \
		linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-crypto

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git