From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tudor Ambarus Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for ECDSA algorithm Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:14:59 +0300 Message-ID: <87fcb3cf-b8ae-47de-550e-c76ae47af431@microchip.com> References: <1484912161-5932-1-git-send-email-nkumbhar@nvidia.com> <20170123142417.GD19957@gondor.apana.org.au> <113d3ef8-ef34-0651-71e7-be09ef55727e@nvidia.com> <20170202135721.GA5289@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , To: Herbert Xu , Nitin Kumbhar Return-path: Received: from esa3.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.233]:45241 "EHLO esa3.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750962AbdHVQPV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:15:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170202135721.GA5289@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Herbert, On 02/02/2017 03:57 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > Yes but RSA had an in-kernel user in the form of module signature > verification. We don't add algorithms to the kernel without > actual users. So this patch-set needs to come with an actual > in-kernel user of ECDSA. ECDSA can be used by the kernel module signing facility too. Is there any interest in using ECDSA by the kernel module signing facility? Thanks, ta