linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH crypto-stable] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to PAGE_SIZE chunks
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:51:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9qXy4X3GtCtt5_1+KTxTXd6+nfhvE_c8Xn6_iJdRWhQmA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXE-UZxw0C3WRVh7RfuWE0BNDT4bt4qJa1SyOH3K-qBBcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:39 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 09:32, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:04 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > Seems this should just be a 'while' loop?
> > >
> > >         while (bytes) {
> > >                 unsigned int todo = min_t(unsigned int, PAGE_SIZE, bytes);
> > >
> > >                 kernel_neon_begin();
> > >                 chacha_doneon(state, dst, src, todo, nrounds);
> > >                 kernel_neon_end();
> > >
> > >                 bytes -= todo;
> > >                 src += todo;
> > >                 dst += todo;
> > >         }
> >
> > The for(;;) is how it's done elsewhere in the kernel (that this patch
> > doesn't touch), because then we can break out of the loop before
> > having to increment src and dst unnecessarily. Likely a pointless
> > optimization as probably the compiler can figure out how to avoid
> > that. But maybe it can't. If you have a strong preference, I can
> > reactor everything to use `while (bytes)`, but if you don't care,
> > let's keep this as-is. Opinion?
> >
>
> Since we're bikeshedding, I'd prefer 'do { } while (bytes);' here,
> given that bytes is guaranteed to be non-zero before we enter the
> loop. But in any case, I'd prefer avoiding for(;;) or while(1) where
> we can.

Okay, will do-while it up for v2.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-20  7:57 [PATCH crypto-stable] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to PAGE_SIZE chunks Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-20  8:32 ` David Laight
2020-04-21  4:02   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-21  4:14   ` FPU register granularity [Was: Re: [PATCH crypto-stable] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to PAGE_SIZE chunks] Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-21  4:25     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-21  7:02     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-21  8:05       ` David Laight
2020-04-21  8:11     ` David Laight
2020-04-22  4:04 ` [PATCH crypto-stable] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to PAGE_SIZE chunks Eric Biggers
2020-04-22  7:23   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-22  7:38     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-22 11:28     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-04-22 19:35       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-22  7:32   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-22  7:39     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-22 19:51       ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2020-04-22 20:17         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-23  8:45           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-22 20:03 ` [PATCH crypto-stable v2] crypto: arch - limit simd usage to 4k chunks Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-22 22:39   ` Eric Biggers
2020-04-22 23:09     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-22 23:18   ` [PATCH crypto-stable v3 1/2] crypto: arch/lib " Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-22 23:18     ` [PATCH crypto-stable v3 2/2] crypto: arch/nhpoly1305 - process in explicit " Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-23 20:39       ` Eric Biggers
2020-04-23  7:18     ` [PATCH crypto-stable v3 1/2] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-23  7:40       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-23  7:47         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-23 18:42       ` Greg KH
2020-04-23 18:47         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-23 20:23           ` Eric Biggers
2020-04-23 20:49             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-28 23:09               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-30  5:30     ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHmME9qXy4X3GtCtt5_1+KTxTXd6+nfhvE_c8Xn6_iJdRWhQmA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).