linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
To: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] dm-crypt: Add bulk crypto processing support
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:07:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHv-k_92j=C8AOzfFzyuiJO=NXWh=zP3=N8MqdyqSUUZf9Hzzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75887e6759ac308a017c83b7fa377516dcd5e2a3.1484215956.git.omosnacek@gmail.com>

Hi Ondrej,

On 12 January 2017 at 18:29, Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch converts dm-crypt to use bulk requests when invoking skcipher
> operations, allowing the crypto drivers to process multiple sectors at once,
> while reducing the overhead caused by the small sector size.
>
> The new code detects if multiple sectors from a bio are contigously stored
> within a single page (which should almost always be the case), and in such case
> processes all these sectors via a single bulk request.
>
> Note that the bio can also consist of several (likely consecutive) pages, which
> could be all bundled in a single request. However, since we need to specify an
> upper bound on how many sectors we are going to send at once (and this bound
> may affect the amount of memory allocated per single request), it is best to
> just limit the request bundling to a single page.

The initial goal of our proposal was to process the encryption requests with the
maximum possible block sizes with a hardware which has automated iv generation
capabilities. But when it is done in software, and if the bulk
requests are processed
sequentially, one block at a time, the memory foot print could be
reduced even if
the bulk request exceeds a page. While your patch looks good, there
are couple of
drawbacks one of which is the maximum size of a bulk request is a page. This
could limit the capability of the crypto hardware. If the whole bio is
processed at
once, which is what qualcomm's version of dm-req-crypt does, it achieves an even
better performance.

> Note that if the 'keycount' parameter of the cipher specification is set to a
> value other than 1, dm-crypt still sends only one sector in each request, since
> in such case the neighboring sectors are encrypted with different keys.

This could be avoided if the key management is done at the crypto layer.

Thanks,
Binoy

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-16  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-12 12:59 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add bulk skcipher requests to crypto API and dm-crypt Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-12 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] crypto: skcipher - Add bulk request processing API Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-12 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] crypto: skcipher - Add bulk request support to walk Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-12 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] crypto: cryptd - Add skcipher bulk request support Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-12 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] crypto: simd - Add " Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-12 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] crypto: aesni-intel " Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-13  3:19   ` Eric Biggers
2017-01-13 11:27     ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2017-01-12 12:59 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] dm-crypt: Add bulk crypto processing support Ondrej Mosnacek
2017-01-16  8:37   ` Binoy Jayan [this message]
2017-01-17 11:15     ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2017-01-13 10:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add bulk skcipher requests to crypto API and dm-crypt Herbert Xu
2017-01-13 12:01   ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2017-01-13 14:29     ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-17 11:20       ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2017-01-18  4:48         ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-19 14:21           ` Ondrej Mosnáček
2017-01-23 13:04             ` Herbert Xu
2017-01-18 17:09     ` Binoy Jayan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHv-k_92j=C8AOzfFzyuiJO=NXWh=zP3=N8MqdyqSUUZf9Hzzw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=binoy.jayan@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=omosnacek@gmail.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).