From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5B7C4346E for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8364C23741 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727120AbgIXHgf (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:36:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50418 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726655AbgIXHgc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:36:32 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84FD6C0613CE for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bxn0p4dj1z1rtZW; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:36:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Bxn0n4X4Kz1qyXD; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:36:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-KCvUrx7nDZ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:36:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 8ronH07tWdu1XzNhwoSiBMOdcXov5iGOJ61TwDCB0oH2QygpST0od5Si4bxqvrCq Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-184-54.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.184.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA4C42C278E; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:36:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Guo Ren Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Anup Patel , Greentime Hu , Zong Li , Albert Ou , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , Nick Hu , linux-riscv , Guo Ren , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] riscv: Fixup static_obj() fail References: <1593266228-61125-1-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> <1593266228-61125-2-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org> <20200911204512.GA2705@aurel32.net> <20200914103836.GB2705@aurel32.net> X-Yow: .. are the STEWED PRUNES still in the HAIR DRYER? Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:36:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200914103836.GB2705@aurel32.net> (Aurelien Jarno's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:38:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87lfgzeidk.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org On Sep 14 2020, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > How should we proceed to get that fixed in time for 5.9? For the older > branches where it has been backported (so far 5.7 and 5.8), should we > just get that commit reverted instead? Can this please be resolved ASAP? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."