From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, agross@kernel.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158154978850.184098.12366153456613977692@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0101016eee224b83-b0577d24-8f51-4e1a-9afb-b3f518e5ba77-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
Quoting Taniya Das (2019-12-09 20:47:35)
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 12/5/2019 5:54 AM, Brian Masney wrote:
> > + d_reg_val = mask - (((mask - 17) * duty->num) / duty->den);
> > + ret = __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(rcg, rcg->freq_tbl,
> > + d_reg_val, duty->num,
> > + duty->den);
>
> The duty-cycle calculation is not accurate.
> There is already a plan to submit the duty-cycle changes from my side.
What are the plans to submit this? Should we expect to see this support
in the next week? Month?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-05 0:24 [PATCH 0/7] qcom: add clk-vibrator driver Brian Masney
2019-12-05 0:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle Brian Masney
2019-12-10 4:47 ` Taniya Das
2020-02-12 23:23 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
[not found] ` <0101016eee224b50-8a5545e2-837f-41c2-9574-b385e111a6b3-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-12-10 11:51 ` Brian Masney
2019-12-13 13:56 ` Linus Walleij
2019-12-05 0:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: Input: drop msm-vibrator in favor of clk-vibrator Brian Masney
2019-12-17 14:11 ` Rob Herring
2019-12-05 0:24 ` [PATCH 3/7] Input: drop msm-vibrator in favor of clk-vibrator driver Brian Masney
2020-02-11 12:18 ` Brian Masney
2019-12-05 0:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: Input: introduce new clock vibrator bindings Brian Masney
2019-12-05 13:56 ` Rob Herring
2019-12-09 0:54 ` Brian Masney
2019-12-09 16:16 ` Rob Herring
2019-12-09 16:55 ` Brian Masney
2020-01-05 8:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-07 12:03 ` Brian Masney
2020-01-07 17:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-01-07 23:18 ` Brian Masney
2019-12-05 0:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] Input: introduce new clock vibrator driver Brian Masney
2019-12-05 0:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: qcom_defconfig: drop msm-vibrator in favor of clk-vibrator driver Brian Masney
2019-12-05 0:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add support for vibrator Brian Masney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158154978850.184098.12366153456613977692@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).