From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF952C169F9 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B965B24672 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:41:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582137694; bh=y154k2uuTbGD94Zlk02vS2B19qqnUVB2EVKv7l94kNw=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:List-ID:From; b=0+c6o3+r/7nufBkfnU5lnlT7ycaWH3wiqpAf0cuvj7JDwuFUjKQ2o3Of0kcHq6nis hNYmmKXRbhC5QGLUtdU1BqaIT6ZawBXBMhIInWYi/8lsjT3w3Vs8LWKqhWOuIvsa8v DWIaewoiypilXRzgvW1oWWPASzrzGVsocxAy9t5o= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726648AbgBSSle (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:41:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35280 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726638AbgBSSle (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:41:34 -0500 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A62B24670; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:41:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582137693; bh=y154k2uuTbGD94Zlk02vS2B19qqnUVB2EVKv7l94kNw=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=Pg2nZ4uoohWZjP+BIMtpi2NMG9sPU8dIIUTvOC22OSIqGA70OfJB/rzFiJCYjpeww DvQL878DwOMYisPb3aPKrLmjbuIOnIjYLwJaVOs1g/vlRJxfuyG+hZApM+W0rTipbe QcDbarV7quXlg7jGtGql29sX3o8CfyG29JO0ztAU= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <2c6728a5-7789-4ca2-a173-67df57fe5f1e@gmail.com> References: <1581067250-12744-1-git-send-email-macpaul.lin@mediatek.com> <158155109134.184098.10100489231587620578@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <1581999138.19053.21.camel@mtkswgap22> <2c6728a5-7789-4ca2-a173-67df57fe5f1e@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765 From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Catalin Marinas , Chunfeng Yun , Evan Green , Fabien Parent , Joerg Roedel , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Mars Cheng , Michael Turquette , Owen Chen , Rob Herring , Ryder Lee , Sean Wang , Shawn Guo , Weiyi Lu , Will Deacon , Yong Wu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, mtk01761 , CC Hwang , Loda Chou , Mediatek WSD Upstream To: Macpaul Lin , Matthias Brugger Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:41:32 -0800 Message-ID: <158213769281.184098.14491216159423631295@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42) >=20 >=20 > On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >=20 > > Hi Stephen, > >=20 > >> Hi Stephen, > >> > >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43) > >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC, > >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application. > >>> > >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig > >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question? > >>> > >> > >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock= parts > >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patche= s to your > >> tree? > >> > >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree. > >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matthias > >=20 > > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too. > > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets? > > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4? > > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7? > >=20 >=20 > Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to. >=20 If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good to me.