From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBFDC4320A for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C066961185 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242026AbhHFBxe (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:53:34 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35850 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230437AbhHFBxd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:53:33 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 917BC61184; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:53:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1628214798; bh=OoWCE85Mo6fAjJs2whbxIvjE66CKcaq0h3kKmA8XkUg=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=Y/o54rmuBuWDkpAqoc45N1Q2hKBQMOYCrjLtw2vAJ8zpAl9bS2P8GIdcu3fB0rDJi NLBNnFSSH9rEkNhBxj6CqZPT8g/Ls1wJy6g2zdJXNp083Z1tUOddrMrIb5SwLXBNXQ O94vzhdYCIgLLq29sZqNmNtJcxcpAQ+A/qRJE7MkoQHxsGTr8iph0oJNzosU1id8MZ wfi9HpZauiaAjkv/I8mGjJGGXXj69Ss6k83Ibt9EcGZ9vy1DDDiimdncgPwJOuBR/J KWipxDWFver+jtmFnjz+ZivGyXKVMNG5MX5IsTNTNfSHyLtbjBJmnXCNwKqj69kKZQ uByoOZEYh9/fA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210704024032.11559-3-shawn.guo@linaro.org> References: <20210704024032.11559-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20210704024032.11559-3-shawn.guo@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: qcom: a53pll/mux: Use unique clock name From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Sivaprakash Murugesan , Benjamin Li , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo To: Shawn Guo Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 18:53:17 -0700 Message-ID: <162821479747.19113.7243652814769771350@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Shawn Guo (2021-07-03 19:40:30) > Different from MSM8916 which has only one a53pll/mux clock, MSM8939 gets > three for Cluster0 (little cores), Cluster1 (big cores) and CCI (Cache > Coherent Interconnect). That said, a53pll/mux clock needs to be named > uniquely. Append @unit-address of device node to the clock name, so > that a53pll/mux will be named like below on MSM8939. >=20 > a53pll@b016000 > a53pll@b116000 > a53pll@b1d0000 >=20 > a53mux@b1d1000 > a53mux@b011000 > a53mux@b111000 >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > --- Applied to clk-next