From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic BARRE Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: arm: document supported STM32 SoC family Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:16:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1ad31902-41d5-d8f3-6817-b69927c2467c@st.com> References: <1512741394-27341-1-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> <20171212210348.proilmqmxf4yl5jn@rob-hp-laptop> <20171212231744.u4wtadrpaq3wp4sq@rob-hp-laptop> <16700917-a53a-c319-d27d-f447c6ed3dce@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Torgue , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Maxime Coquelin , Gwenael Treuveur , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/2017 04:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Ludovic BARRE wrote: >> hi Rob >> >> Today there was no bindings documentation for STM32 SoC >> already upstreamed. This patch adds initial list of STM32 >> existing in kernel. >> The next serie adds just new soc and one compatible on STM32 list. > > Yes, and that series will go thru arm-soc tree so this patch needs to too. You are right, to avoid merge conflict. I will included this patch in my series on "ARM: stm32: add initial STM32MPU support" This patch can be abandoned. > >> So, I think you could apply this patch. > > If your series is not going into 4.16, then I can take this one. > > Rob >