From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Porter Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] Documentation: add schedule for removing private EDMA API Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:05:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20120920160520.GD16522@beef> References: <1348152226-13588-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <1348152226-13588-14-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <20120920155858.GA4583@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120920155858.GA4583@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Linux DaVinci Kernel List , Linux OMAP List , Russell King , Benoit Cousson , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Documentation List , Tony Lindgren , Linux MMC List , Devicetree Discuss , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Vinod Koul , Rob Landley , Dan Williams , Linux SPI Devel List , Chris Ball , Linux ARM Kernel List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:58:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:43:46AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > We decided at kernel summit that we'd stop bothering with this, it's > mostly just bitrot and rarely read. I guess the ASoC driver update > isn't ready yet? Ok, I'll drop this from the series. No, I'm just getting real time now to work on the davinci-pcm dma engine conversion and cyclic dma support for edma. That driver is somewhat of a mess as it has some older platforms dependent on SRAM-based ping-pong buffering and that all need to be sorted during this. It is the only remaining blocker though for getting rid of the private API. -Matt